Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Author
| Alayan, Alexandra | 1 |
| Baird, Matthew D. | 1 |
| Baquet, Zachary | 1 |
| Devers, Christopher J. | 1 |
| Devers, Erin E. | 1 |
| Echeverry, Shawnie | 1 |
| Heavner, Shayla K. | 1 |
| Ho, Nina | 1 |
| Miller, Paul D. | 1 |
| Pane, John F. | 1 |
| Robertson, John | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| California | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Measures of Academic Progress | 2 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkDevers, Erin E.; Devers, Christopher J.; Miller, Paul D.; Alayan, Alexandra; Robertson, John; Baquet, Zachary; Ho, Nina; Echeverry, Shawnie; Heavner, Shayla K. – Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 2022
Many factors contribute to the achievement gap in the U.S. As an intervention to help narrow the gap, tutoring presents a potentially powerful solution. Decades of research suggest that tutoring is an effective, evidence-based approach to improve student success, with effect sizes ranging from 0.4. to 2.0. As many school systems in the U.S. move…
Descriptors: Electronic Learning, Tutoring, Program Evaluation, Program Effectiveness
Baird, Matthew D.; Pane, John F. – Educational Researcher, 2019
Evaluators report effects of education initiatives as standardized effect sizes, a scale that has merits but obscures interpretation of the effects' practical importance. Consequently, educators and policymakers seek more readily interpretable translations of evaluation results. One popular metric is the number of years of learning necessary to…
Descriptors: Outcomes of Education, Program Evaluation, Educational Policy, Evaluators
