ERIC - Search Results

Descriptor

Analysis of Variance	2
Comparative Testing	2
Higher Education	2
Research Design	2
Adults	1
Age Differences	1
College Students	1
Computer Assisted Testing	1
Extraversion Introversion	1
Females	1
Intermode Differences	1
Item Analysis	1
Males	1
Marital Status	1
Multivariate Analysis	1
Personality Measures	1
Psychological Patterns	1
Sex Differences	1
Social Cognition	1
Test Format	1
More ▼

Source

Computers in Human Behavior

Author

McVay, Micheal R.	1
Schuldberg, David	1

Publication Type

Reports - Research	2
Dissertations/Theses -…	1
Information Analyses	1
Journal Articles	1

Education Level

Audience

Location

Laws, Policies, & Programs

Assessments and Surveys

Minnesota Multiphasic…	2
Myers Briggs Type Indicator	1

What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Showing all 2 results Save | Export

The MMPI Is Less Sensitive to the Automated Testing Format than It Is to Repeated Testing: Item and Scale Effects.

Peer reviewed

Schuldberg, David – Computers in Human Behavior, 1988

Describes study that investigated the effects of computerized test administration on undergraduates' responses to the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), and discusses methodological considerations important in evaluating the sensitivity of personality inventories in different administration formats. Results analyze the effects of…

Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Comparative Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Higher Education

A Comparison of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Extraversion-Introversion Scale, and the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory 0 Scale (Social Introversion).

Download full text

McVay, Micheal R. – 1993

The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) Extraversion-Introversion scale was compared with the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) 0 scale (Social Introversion) for 18 male and 66 female adult students in introductory courses in psychology, aged 17 to 83 years. A status survey design was used with a priori and post hoc groupings.…

Descriptors: Adults, Age Differences, Analysis of Variance, College Students