NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Burgess, Philip M.; And Others – Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1984
Reevaluated findings for subtle items in the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory D Scale in 214 subjects based on the distinction between item subtlety and face validity. Results indicated that the inclusion of nonpathological items in the D scale did not lead to greater predictive validity of depression criteria. (LLL)
Descriptors: Content Analysis, Depression (Psychology), Item Analysis, Males
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Gynther, Malcolm D.; And Others – Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1979
Divided the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory Pd scale into obvious (O), neutral (N), and subtle (S) subscales. Using college students results were: Pd-O scores were the most powerful predictor of criterion; Pd-S scores made a smaller but unique contribution; and Pd-N scores made no contribution not already in Pd-O criterion…
Descriptors: Adults, Item Analysis, Personality Measures, Predictive Validity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Burkhart, Barry R.; And Others – Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1980
Obvious items were good predictors of all criteria; neutral items overlapped considerably with obvious items; and subtle items generally did not contribute uniquely to the prediction of any of the concurrent measures of depression. (Author)
Descriptors: Depression (Psychology), Item Analysis, Personality Measures, Predictive Validity
Sandness, David Grimsrud – 1966
This study evaluated the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) as a predictor of employment status with male, physically handicapped vocational rehabilitants of employable age who had been patients at centers at the University of North Dakota and the University of Minnesota; and compared Katzell's Double Cross-Validation (DCV) with a…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Analysis of Variance, Doctoral Dissertations, Educational Background