Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Author
Blank, Rolf K. | 1 |
Brandon, David P. | 1 |
Chelimsky, Eleanor | 1 |
Haertel, Edward H. | 1 |
Herman, Joan L. | 1 |
King, Jean A. | 1 |
Lapointe, Archie | 1 |
Robinson, Glen E. | 1 |
Roeber, Edward | 1 |
Rohmer-Hirt, Johnna A. | 1 |
Winfield, Linda F. | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Reports - Evaluative | 4 |
Journal Articles | 3 |
Opinion Papers | 2 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 2 |
Legal/Legislative/Regulatory… | 1 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Minnesota | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 2 |
Elementary and Secondary… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
National Assessment of… | 7 |
SAT (College Admission Test) | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
King, Jean A.; Rohmer-Hirt, Johnna A. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2011
From the 1980s to the present, educational accountability in the United States has grown dramatically. Such accountability in U.S. school districts, although driven primarily by external demands, has internal manifestations as well. The chapter traces the historical development of internal evaluation in American school districts, then highlights…
Descriptors: Public Schools, Testing Programs, Standardized Tests, School Districts
Wirtz, Willard; Lapointe, Archie – 1982
Since 1969 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) reports on the scholastic achievements of the nation's elementary and secondary level students have been appearing frequently. The reactions to these reports are a perplexing mix of acclaim and criticism, of expressed respect but apparently slight regard. This study assesses NAEP and…
Descriptors: Educational Assessment, Educational Quality, Elementary Secondary Education, Program Effectiveness
Chelimsky, Eleanor – 1992
This letter is an interim response to the October 7, 1991 request from the Committee on Education and Labor and the Subcommittee on Elementary, Secondary, and Vocational Education of the House of Representatives asking for a review of the National Assessment Governing Board (NAGB) achievement levels for the National Assessment of Educational…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Academic Standards, Data Analysis, Government Role
Blank, Rolf K.; Roeber, Edward – 1992
Since the authorization of the use of the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) through the Trial State Assessment to provide state-based data, debate over the proposed expansion of the NAEP has strengthened. To assist states in analyzing and interpreting 1990 data on eighth-grade mathematics and to assist in planning subsequent NAEP…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Educational Assessment, Educational Policy, Grade 8

Winfield, Linda F. – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1990
The relationship between school-level minimum competency testing (MCT) programs and student reading proficiency measured by the 1983-84 National Assessment of Educational Progress was studied in subsamples of 10,367 fourth graders, 10,829 eighth graders, and 13,513 eleventh graders. No advantages of MCT programs were seen in grade 4. (SLD)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Educational Change, Elementary School Students, Elementary Secondary Education
Robinson, Glen E.; Brandon, David P. – 1994
Whether state average test scores on the 1992 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) Trial State Assessment in mathematics should be used to compare and rank states according to the quality or proficiency of their educational programs is examined. Data from eighth graders from the Trial State Assessment are analyzed. Analysis shows…
Descriptors: Community Influence, Comparative Analysis, Demography, Educational Quality
Haertel, Edward H.; Herman, Joan L. – Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, 2005
In this article, the authors describe various rationales for accountability testing programs over the past century. This history forms the backdrop for current test-driven reforms, including Public Law 107-110, the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB), which was signed into law in January 2002. The goals of the authors are first, to illustrate…
Descriptors: Test Use, Testing Programs, Federal Legislation, Testing