Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Academic Achievement | 1 |
| Aptitude Tests | 1 |
| College Entrance Examinations | 1 |
| Data Analysis | 1 |
| Elementary School Students | 1 |
| High Schools | 1 |
| Language Arts | 1 |
| Mathematics | 1 |
| Middle School Students | 1 |
| Models | 1 |
| Repetition | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Annenberg Institute for… | 1 |
Author
| Jeffrey Penney | 1 |
| Michael Gilraine | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| High Schools | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Junior High Schools | 1 |
| Middle Schools | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| North Carolina | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Preliminary Scholastic… | 1 |
| SAT (College Admission Test) | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Download full textMichael Gilraine; Jeffrey Penney – Annenberg Institute for School Reform at Brown University, 2021
An administrative rule allowed students who failed an exam to retake it shortly after, triggering strong `teach to the test' incentives to raise these students' test scores for the retake. We develop a model that accounts for truncation and find that these students score 0.14 standard deviations higher on the retest. Using a regression…
Descriptors: Tests, Models, Scores, Test Coaching
