Publication Date
In 2025 | 1 |
Since 2024 | 1 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 3 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Author
Catherine Martin | 1 |
Elaine McColl | 1 |
Janice Murray | 1 |
Jenefer Sargent | 1 |
Johanna Geytenbeek | 1 |
John Swettenham | 1 |
Julie Lachkovic | 1 |
Kate Laws | 1 |
Lily Potts | 1 |
Lindsay Pennington | 1 |
Michael Clarke | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Education Level
Elementary Education | 2 |
Early Childhood Education | 1 |
Grade 2 | 1 |
Primary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Netherlands | 2 |
United Kingdom (England) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Raven Progressive Matrices | 3 |
Mullen Scales of Early… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Lindsay Pennington; Lily Potts; Janice Murray; Johanna Geytenbeek; Kate Laws; Jenefer Sargent; Michael Clarke; John Swettenham; Julie Lachkovic; Catherine Martin; Elaine McColl – International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 2025
Background: Current UK measures of early spoken language comprehension require manipulation of toys and/or verbal responses and are not accessible to children with severe motor impairments. The Computer-Based Instrument for Low motor Language Testing (C-BiLLT) (originally validated in Dutch) is a computerized test of spoken language comprehension…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Children, Motor Development, Psychomotor Skills
Touw, Kirsten W. J.; Vogelaar, Bart; Thissen, Floor; Resing, Wilma C. M. – Educational & Child Psychology, 2019
Background: Outcomes of static tests provide an indication of what children have learned in the past, up to the moment of testing, and can therefore underestimate the cognitive abilities of atypically developing children, such as children with language difficulties. In contrast, dynamic tests aim to examine children's potential for learning. The…
Descriptors: Alternative Assessment, Prompting, Language Impairments, Language Skills
Stevenson, Claire E. – International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 2017
This study contrasted the effects of tutoring, multiple try and no feedback on children's progression in analogy solving and examined individual differences herein. Feedback that includes additional hints or explanations leads to the greatest learning gains in adults. However, children process feedback differently from adults and effective…
Descriptors: Tutoring, Feedback (Response), Children, Short Term Memory