Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Factor Analysis | 2 |
| Intelligence Tests | 2 |
| Item Analysis | 2 |
| Test Items | 2 |
| Adults | 1 |
| Aptitude Tests | 1 |
| Classification | 1 |
| Cognitive Processes | 1 |
| College Students | 1 |
| Content Validity | 1 |
| Evaluation Research | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Intelligence | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
| Researchers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Raven Progressive Matrices | 2 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkVigneau, Francois; Bors, Douglas A. – Intelligence, 2008
Various taxonomies of Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices (APM) items have been proposed in the literature to account for performance on the test. In the present article, three such taxonomies based on information processing, namely Carpenter, Just and Shell's [Carpenter, P.A., Just, M.A., & Shell, P., (1990). What one intelligence test…
Descriptors: Intelligence, Intelligence Tests, Factor Analysis, Classification
Download full textZimowski, Michele F.; Wothke, Werner – 1987
Tests of spatial ability were analyzed for their analog (visuospatial) and nonanalog (verbal reasoning) components, using factor analyses of items and test scores. The self-selected sample consisted of over 2000 clients (average age about 26 or 27) employing the Johnson O'Connor Research Foundation's aptitude evaluation services in 12 metropolitan…
Descriptors: Adults, Aptitude Tests, Content Validity, Factor Analysis
