Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Attention Control | 2 |
| Models | 2 |
| Attention | 1 |
| Classification | 1 |
| Cognitive Ability | 1 |
| Cognitive Processes | 1 |
| Data | 1 |
| Difficulty Level | 1 |
| Intelligence | 1 |
| Intelligence Differences | 1 |
| Sample Size | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Raven Progressive Matrices | 2 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkRen, Xuezhu; Goldhammer, Frank; Moosbrugger, Helfried; Schweizer, Karl – Learning and Individual Differences, 2012
The aim of the present study was to clarify the nature of the ability-specific and position-specific components of Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices (APM) by relating them to a number of types of attention. The ability-specific component represents the constant part of cognitive performance whereas the position-specific component reflects the…
Descriptors: Attention, Cognitive Ability, Models, Data
Peer reviewedRoberts, Richard D.; And Others – Intelligence, 1988
The Ravens Standard Progressive Matrices Test was administered to 48 subjects who then performed a card-sorting task under single- and competing-task conditions. Hick's Law and the Roth-Jensen procedure were used in task development. Complexity should have a more central role in speed of processing models of intelligence than ability to divide…
Descriptors: Attention Control, Classification, Cognitive Processes, Difficulty Level
