Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Semantics | 2 |
| Accuracy | 1 |
| Automation | 1 |
| Cognitive Processes | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Construct Validity | 1 |
| Creative Thinking | 1 |
| Creativity Tests | 1 |
| Difficulty Level | 1 |
| Item Analysis | 1 |
| Language Usage | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Journal of Creative Behavior | 2 |
Author
| Badia, Toni | 1 |
| Beisemann, Marie | 1 |
| Bürkner, Paul-Christian | 1 |
| Forthmann, Boris | 1 |
| Holling, Heinz | 1 |
| Klein, Ariel | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Remote Associates Test | 2 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkBeisemann, Marie; Forthmann, Boris; Bürkner, Paul-Christian; Holling, Heinz – Journal of Creative Behavior, 2020
The Remote Associates Test (RAT; Mednick, 1962; Mednick & Mednick, 1967) is a commonly employed test of creative convergent thinking. The RAT is scored with a dichotomous scoring, scoring correct answers as 1 and all other answers as 0. Based on recent research into the information processing underlying RAT performance, we argued that the…
Descriptors: Psychometrics, Scoring, Tests, Semantics
Klein, Ariel; Badia, Toni – Journal of Creative Behavior, 2015
In this study we show how complex creative relations can arise from fairly frequent semantic relations observed in everyday language. By doing this, we reflect on some key cognitive aspects of linguistic and general creativity. In our experimentation, we automated the process of solving a battery of Remote Associates Test tasks. By applying…
Descriptors: Language Usage, Semantics, Natural Language Processing, Test Items
