Descriptor
| Adults | 2 |
| Cognitive Style | 2 |
| Correlation | 2 |
| Sex Differences | 2 |
| Aptitude Tests | 1 |
| Career Counseling | 1 |
| Cognitive Tests | 1 |
| Construct Validity | 1 |
| Factor Analysis | 1 |
| Females | 1 |
| Males | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Perceptual and Motor Skills | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Rod and Frame Test | 2 |
| Group Embedded Figures Test | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedAllen, Mary J.; And Others – Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1982
Adults took the Rod and Frame, Portable Rod and Frame, and Embedded Figures Tests. Absolute and algebraic frame-effect scores were more reliable and valid than rod-effect algebraic scores. Correlations with the Embedded Figures Test were so low that the interchangeability of these field articulation measures is questionable. (Author/RD)
Descriptors: Adults, Cognitive Style, Correlation, Measurement Techniques
Schroeder, David H. – 1991
This study examined the construct validity of the Rod and Frame Test (RFT). Subjects were 554 clients (269 males and 285 females) (aged 14 to 65 years) of the Johnson O'Connor Research Foundation (JOCRF), a vocational guidance service. In a battery of diverse ability and style tests (19 tests of the JOCRF battery and 4 tests of cognitive style),…
Descriptors: Adults, Aptitude Tests, Career Counseling, Cognitive Style
