Descriptor
| Cognitive Style | 3 |
| Test Validity | 3 |
| Cognitive Tests | 2 |
| Scoring Formulas | 2 |
| Test Reliability | 2 |
| Adults | 1 |
| Analysis of Variance | 1 |
| Correlation | 1 |
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Intelligence Differences | 1 |
| Measurement Techniques | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Rod and Frame Test | 3 |
| Group Embedded Figures Test | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedAllen, Mary J.; And Others – Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1982
Adults took the Rod and Frame, Portable Rod and Frame, and Embedded Figures Tests. Absolute and algebraic frame-effect scores were more reliable and valid than rod-effect algebraic scores. Correlations with the Embedded Figures Test were so low that the interchangeability of these field articulation measures is questionable. (Author/RD)
Descriptors: Adults, Cognitive Style, Correlation, Measurement Techniques
Download full textTomala, Gail; Pawelkiewicz, Walter – 1978
The relationship between field independence, intelligence, and social class was investigated in a group of 150 kindergarten, second, and third grade children. The effect of social class upon field independence was also studied after controlling for intelligence. The Portable Rod and Frame Test was administered ten times using instructions…
Descriptors: Cognitive Style, Cognitive Tests, Intelligence Differences, Predictor Variables
Peer reviewedMcGarvey, Bill; And Others – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1977
The most consistently used scoring system for the rod-and-frame task has been the total number of degrees in error from the true vertical. Since a logical case can be made for at least four alternative scoring systems, a thorough comparison of all five systems was performed. (Author/CTM)
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Cognitive Style, Cognitive Tests, Elementary Education
