NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 3 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Mehrens, William A.; Phillips, S. E. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1987
A taxonomic matrix classification was used to assess the curricular validity of the Stanford Achievement Tests for the mathematics textbooks used in a school district's fifth and sixth grades. Rasch item difficulty was also examined. Results indicated only small differences between textbooks. (GDC)
Descriptors: Difficulty Level, Elementary School Mathematics, Intermediate Grades, Item Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Airasian, Peter W. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1985
The Stanford Achievement Test Forms E and F were judged to be one of the best achievement batteries for assessing basic skills taught in grades one through nine. The test publisher provides several booklets in addition to the administration manual. These include the Norms Booklet, Handbook of Instructional Strategies, and Guide to Classroom…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Achievement Rating, Achievement Tests, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Freeman, Donald J.; And Others – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1983
This investigation attempts to determine if the congruity in textbook-test content varies as a function of different styles of textbook use. Across all standardized tests, instructional validity of the five styles of textbook use was far lower for the management-by-objectives model than for any other styles. (Author/PN)
Descriptors: Case Studies, Content Analysis, Grade 4, Intermediate Grades