Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
At Risk Students | 2 |
Classification | 2 |
Elementary School Students | 2 |
Screening Tests | 2 |
Accuracy | 1 |
Achievement Tests | 1 |
Comparative Analysis | 1 |
Grade 1 | 1 |
Grade 2 | 1 |
Grade 3 | 1 |
Identification | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Assessment for Effective… | 2 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 2 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
Elementary Education | 2 |
Primary Education | 2 |
Early Childhood Education | 1 |
Grade 1 | 1 |
Grade 2 | 1 |
Grade 3 | 1 |
Audience
Location
Florida | 2 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Stanford Achievement Tests | 2 |
Florida Comprehensive… | 1 |
Peabody Picture Vocabulary… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Petscher, Yaacov; Koon, Sharon – Assessment for Effective Intervention, 2020
The assessment of screening accuracy and setting of cut points for a universal screener have traditionally been evaluated using logistic regression analysis. This analytic technique has been frequently used to evaluate the trade-offs in correct classification with misidentification of individuals who are at risk of performing poorly on a later…
Descriptors: Screening Tests, Accuracy, Regression (Statistics), Classification
Johnson, Evelyn S.; Jenkins, Joseph R.; Petscher, Yaacov – Assessment for Effective Intervention, 2010
In a response-to-intervention framework, schools typically employ a direct route approach to screening, in which students identified as at risk by a screening process are directly placed into intervention. Direct route approaches require screening decisions to be highly accurate, but few studies examining the predictive validity of reading…
Descriptors: Screening Tests, Reading Tests, At Risk Students, Predictive Validity