Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Author
| Alexander, Donald L. | 1 |
| Baker, Eva L. | 1 |
| Barrera, Marbella | 1 |
| Brown, Richard S. | 1 |
| Herman, Joan L. | 1 |
| Holst, Patricia | 1 |
| McBee, Matthew T. | 1 |
| Peters, Scott J. | 1 |
| Puzzuoli, David A. | 1 |
| Stone, Brian | 1 |
| Waterman, Craig | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Reports - Evaluative | 3 |
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| California | 1 |
| Georgia | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Stanford Achievement Tests | 5 |
| Cognitive Abilities Test | 1 |
| Iowa Tests of Basic Skills | 1 |
| School and College Ability… | 1 |
| Sequential Tests of… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkMcBee, Matthew T.; Peters, Scott J.; Waterman, Craig – Gifted Child Quarterly, 2014
Best practice in gifted and talented identification procedures involves making decisions on the basis of multiple measures. However, very little research has investigated the impact of different methods of combining multiple measures. This article examines the consequences of the conjunctive ("and"), disjunctive/complementary…
Descriptors: Best Practices, Ability Identification, Academically Gifted, Correlation
Download full textHerman, Joan L.; Brown, Richard S.; Baker, Eva L. – 2000
The progress of students and schools in California is examined by reviewing the state's recent test history and the state's progress in creating a sound, standards-based assessment system. The story about California is mixed. Overall performance on the Stanford Achievement Test, ninth edition (SAT-9) shows that the state average, overall grades…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Accountability, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewedStone, Brian; And Others – Exceptional Children, 1988
Stanford Achievement Test scores of 1,434 elementary-level students already placed in either regular or special education programs were arranged according to four cutoff points: 20th, 15th, 10th, and 5th percentiles. This identification method, setting the cutoff at the 5 percent level, is proposed as a preliminary screening device for special…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Cutting Scores, Disabilities, Elementary Education
Barrera, Marbella; Holst, Patricia – 1992
Results from testing programs in the Newark (New Jersey) public schools for 1991-92 are discussed. The system used three testing programs in the school year: (1) the Newark Uniform Testing Program (Stanford Achievement Series, eighth edition); (2) the New Jersey Statewide Testing System; and (3) the Bilingual Testing Program. Results of the Newark…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Achievement Tests, Bilingual Education, Curriculum Evaluation
Puzzuoli, David A.; Alexander, Donald L. – 1971
In September 1962, the State Board of Education initiated a broad annual study of the academic achievement and scholastic aptitude of West Virginia public schools called the State-County Testing Program. The results of this program in Region II West Virginia schools for 1965-66 - 1969-70 are analyzed to: 1) identify discernable trends; 2) find any…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Academic Aptitude, Accountability, Achievement Tests
