Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Author
Alonzo, Julie | 1 |
Anderson, Daniel | 1 |
Jamgochian, Elisa | 1 |
Lai, Cheng-Fei | 1 |
McBee, Matthew T. | 1 |
Mitchell, Ross E. | 1 |
Nese, Joseph F. T. | 1 |
Park, Bitnara Jasmine | 1 |
Peters, Scott J. | 1 |
Qi, Sen | 1 |
Saez, Leilani | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 2 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Numerical/Quantitative Data | 1 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Secondary Education | 2 |
Early Childhood Education | 1 |
Elementary Education | 1 |
Grade 2 | 1 |
Audience
Location
Georgia | 1 |
United States | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Stanford Achievement Tests | 3 |
Cognitive Abilities Test | 1 |
Iowa Tests of Basic Skills | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
McBee, Matthew T.; Peters, Scott J.; Waterman, Craig – Gifted Child Quarterly, 2014
Best practice in gifted and talented identification procedures involves making decisions on the basis of multiple measures. However, very little research has investigated the impact of different methods of combining multiple measures. This article examines the consequences of the conjunctive ("and"), disjunctive/complementary…
Descriptors: Best Practices, Ability Identification, Academically Gifted, Correlation
Qi, Sen; Mitchell, Ross E. – Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 2012
The first large-scale, nationwide academic achievement testing program using Stanford Achievement Test (Stanford) for deaf and hard-of-hearing children in the United States started in 1969. Over the past three decades, the Stanford has served as a benchmark in the field of deaf education for assessing student academic achievement. However, the…
Descriptors: Testing Programs, Educational Testing, Deafness, Academic Achievement
Jamgochian, Elisa; Park, Bitnara Jasmine; Nese, Joseph F. T.; Lai, Cheng-Fei; Saez, Leilani; Anderson, Daniel; Alonzo, Julie; Tindal, Gerald – Behavioral Research and Teaching, 2010
In this technical report, we provide reliability and validity evidence for the easyCBM[R] Reading measures for grade 2 (word and passage reading fluency and multiple choice reading comprehension). Evidence for reliability includes internal consistency and item invariance. Evidence for validity includes concurrent, predictive, and construct…
Descriptors: Grade 2, Reading Comprehension, Testing Programs, Reading Fluency