NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20250
Since 20240
Since 2021 (last 5 years)0
Since 2016 (last 10 years)1
Since 2006 (last 20 years)1
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing all 6 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Miles, Sandra; Fulbrook, Paul; Mainwaring-Mägi, Debra – Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 2018
Universal screening of very early school-age children (age 4-7 years) is important for early identification of learning problems that may require enhanced learning opportunity. In this context, use of standardized instruments is critical to obtain valid, reliable, and comparable assessment outcomes. A wide variety of standardized instruments is…
Descriptors: Standardized Tests, Screening Tests, Young Children, Usability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Glutting, Joseph J. – Journal of School Psychology, 1989
Introduces Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition (SB4) as an attempt to revitalize Stanford-Binet by maintaining links with previous editions while simultaneously incorporating more recent developments found in other popular tests of intelligence. Discusses the SB4's theoretical foundation, materials and administration, scaling,…
Descriptors: Intelligence Tests, Models, Test Reliability, Test Use
Coffman, William E. – 1986
Three new tests presented as alternatives to the Wechsler tests for children were described in earlier papers of this session. This discussion reviews the earlier papers and comments on the developed tests: (1) the Woodcock-Johnson test; (2) the new Stanford-Binet; and (3) the K-ABC. The Woodcock-Johnson battery, state-of-the-art applications of…
Descriptors: Cognitive Ability, Cognitive Measurement, Cognitive Tests, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Laurent, Jeff; And Others – Psychological Assessment, 1992
Validity studies conducted with the Stanford Binet Intelligence Scale: Fourth Edition (SB:FE) are reviewed. Results support its validity as a measure of general mental ability and that it can distinguish between groups of youngsters with differing intellectual abilities. Recommendations are made for use of the SB:FE. (SLD)
Descriptors: Children, Factor Analysis, Factor Structure, Intelligence
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Waddell, Deborah D. – Journal of School Psychology, 1980
A review of the technical data available on the 1972 norms edition of the Stanford-Binet demonstrates how inadequate these data are. The Stanford-Binet should not continue to be used in important decision making processes unless this weakness is corrected. (Author)
Descriptors: Educational Assessment, Elementary Secondary Education, Intelligence Quotient, Intelligence Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Krohn, Emily J.; Lamp, Robert E. – Journal of School Psychology, 1999
Investigates the stability of the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale: Fourth Edition (SB:FE) and the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (K-ABC) by testing a sample of 65 children from low socioeconomic status families. Mean scores for the group were roughly equivalent, correlation coefficients were high, and change scores for the majority of…
Descriptors: Cognitive Ability, High Risk Students, Intelligence Tests, Longitudinal Studies