Descriptor
Intelligence Tests | 11 |
Test Validity | 8 |
Comparative Testing | 4 |
Children | 3 |
Concurrent Validity | 3 |
Age Differences | 2 |
Cognitive Ability | 2 |
Elementary Education | 2 |
Low Income Groups | 2 |
Mental Retardation | 2 |
Models | 2 |
More ▼ |
Source
Journal of School Psychology | 11 |
Author
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 11 |
Reports - Research | 10 |
Information Analyses | 3 |
Reports - General | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Canada | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Stanford Binet Intelligence… | 11 |
Kaufman Assessment Battery… | 3 |
Wechsler Intelligence Scale… | 2 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Rothlisberg, Barbara A. – Journal of School Psychology, 1987
Examined concurrent validity of Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale, 4th edition (SB IV) and the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised (WISC-R) in a homogeneous, nonexceptional sample of 32 early elementary school children. Findings suggest that SB IV has significant positive relationship with WISC-R. The tests displayed a moderate level…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Comparative Testing, Concurrent Validity, Intelligence Tests

Krohn, Emily J.; Lamp, Robert E. – Journal of School Psychology, 1989
Investigated validity of Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition and Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children with 89 preschool Head Start children from low-income families, using Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale-Form LM as criterion measure. Found some support for concurrent and construct validity of both instruments for use with…
Descriptors: Comparative Testing, Concurrent Validity, Intelligence Tests, Low Income Groups

Zins, Joseph E.; Barnett, David W. – Journal of School Psychology, 1984
Reports findings about the relationship between the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (K-ABC), the Weschler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised (WISC-R), and the Stanford-Binet for 40 children with no known impairments. The overall results suggested some support for the use of the K-ABC as a measure of intelligence. (BH)
Descriptors: Children, Elementary Education, Intelligence Tests, Test Validity

Keith, Timothy Z.; And Others – Journal of School Psychology, 1988
Studied whether Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale: Fourth Edition corresponds to theory that guided its construction, using first-order confirmatory factor analysis with entire standardization sample and three age groups. Results generally support the four factors as reflecting the underlying structure of the new Binet, but were less supportive of…
Descriptors: Factor Analysis, Intelligence Tests, Test Theory, Test Validity

Lukens, John – Journal of School Psychology, 1988
Administered the Stanford-Binet, Fourth Edition, to 31 mentally retarded adolescents who had previously been tested with the Stanford-Binet, L-M, with a mean interval between testings of 17.3 months. Found an intertest correlation of .86 and a median intelligence quotient change of three points in either direction. Compatability of scores supports…
Descriptors: Adolescents, Comparative Testing, Intelligence Tests, Mental Retardation

Glutting, Joseph J. – Journal of School Psychology, 1989
Introduces Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition (SB4) as an attempt to revitalize Stanford-Binet by maintaining links with previous editions while simultaneously incorporating more recent developments found in other popular tests of intelligence. Discusses the SB4's theoretical foundation, materials and administration, scaling,…
Descriptors: Intelligence Tests, Models, Test Reliability, Test Use

Atkinson, Leslie – Journal of School Psychology, 1991
Administered 2-, 4-, and 6-subtest Stanford-Binet (Fourth Edition) short forms to 53 children (ages 6-10) with Total Composite (TC) Standard Age Score (SAS) under 79. Compared prorated Partial Composite SASs based on subtests with TC SASs. Six subtests correlated with TC SAS; only one six-subtest short form accurately approximated TC SAS at level…
Descriptors: Children, Developmental Disabilities, Foreign Countries, Intelligence Tests

Shanahan, Richard; Bradley-Johnson, Sharon – Journal of School Psychology, 1992
Examined concurrent validity of Nonvocal Cognitive Quotient (NVCQ) of Cognitive Abilities Scale (CAS) and Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale: Fourth Edition (Binet IV) for two and three year olds. Found adequate concurrent validity for CAS NVCQ and Binet IV Verbal Comprehension at both age levels as well as for Nonverbal Reasoning/Visualization…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Cognitive Ability, Comparative Testing, Concurrent Validity

Gridley, Betty E.; McIntosh, David E. – Journal of School Psychology, 1991
Studied structure of Stanford-Binet: Fourth Edition for normal children who were not part of standardization sample. Found that, for children aged 2-6 years, either 2- or 3-factor model could be supported. For students aged 7-11, neither of 2 models studied was supported. Alternative model with verbal reasoning, quantitative reasoning,…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Children, Construct Validity, Elementary Education

Waddell, Deborah D. – Journal of School Psychology, 1980
A review of the technical data available on the 1972 norms edition of the Stanford-Binet demonstrates how inadequate these data are. The Stanford-Binet should not continue to be used in important decision making processes unless this weakness is corrected. (Author)
Descriptors: Educational Assessment, Elementary Secondary Education, Intelligence Quotient, Intelligence Tests

Krohn, Emily J.; Lamp, Robert E. – Journal of School Psychology, 1999
Investigates the stability of the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale: Fourth Edition (SB:FE) and the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (K-ABC) by testing a sample of 65 children from low socioeconomic status families. Mean scores for the group were roughly equivalent, correlation coefficients were high, and change scores for the majority of…
Descriptors: Cognitive Ability, High Risk Students, Intelligence Tests, Longitudinal Studies