Descriptor
| Intelligence Tests | 2 |
| Test Validity | 2 |
| Adults | 1 |
| Children | 1 |
| Classification | 1 |
| Clinical Diagnosis | 1 |
| Cognitive Tests | 1 |
| Concurrent Validity | 1 |
| Handicap Identification | 1 |
| Measures (Individuals) | 1 |
| Mental Retardation | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Mental Retardation | 2 |
Author
| Kunen, Seth | 1 |
| Wilson, William M. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 1 |
| Researchers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Stanford Binet Intelligence… | 2 |
| Slosson Intelligence Test | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedKunen, Seth; And Others – Mental Retardation, 1996
Concurrent validity testing of the Slosson Intelligence Test-Revised with the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale (Fourth Edition), involving 191 individuals (ages 5-69 and IQs of 36 to 110), found a high correlation between the two scales. However, the Slosson unsatisfactorily matched the Stanford-Binet's assignment of individuals to IQ categories.…
Descriptors: Adults, Children, Classification, Cognitive Tests
Peer reviewedWilson, William M. – Mental Retardation, 1992
This article concludes that the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale: Fourth Edition is poorly suited for assessment of children less than five years old with possible mild mental retardation and for persons of any age with possible severe mental retardation. The continued use of Form L-M is recommended for these populations. (Author/DB)
Descriptors: Clinical Diagnosis, Handicap Identification, Intelligence Tests, Measures (Individuals)
