NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Education Level
Location
New York2
Laws, Policies, & Programs
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 31 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Garfinkel, Robin; Thorndike, Robert L. – Child Development, 1976
This study was conducted to determine how items of the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale, Form L-M, had performed in the 1930's standardization sample in comparison with the 1972 standardization sample. (SB)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Comparative Testing, Group Testing, Intelligence Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Rogers, Sally J. – Journal of School Psychology, 1982
Administered the Slosson Intelligence Test (SIT) to 92 preschool children. Administered the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale to a sample of the group, and the results were compared to the results from the SIT. Results indicated the SIT overestimated the performance of average preschool children. (Author)
Descriptors: Comparative Testing, Intelligence Tests, Preschool Children, Scores
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bloom, Allan S.; And Others – Psychology in the Schools, 1976
WISC-Rs and Stanford-Binets were administered to 50 children with developmental disabilities referred for comprehensive evaluations. Fifty-four percent of the children received different classifications using the two instruments. Different classifications of intellectual level may be derived for the same child depending upon which test is used.…
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Comparative Testing, Elementary Secondary Education, Handicapped Children
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Carvajal, Howard; And Others – Psychology in the Schools, 1988
A kindergarten class of nine boys and 11 girls took the 1986 Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale (Fourth Edition) and the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence. Of six correlations of total scores and subtests pairs, only the correlation of total scores was statistically significant. (Author)
Descriptors: Comparative Testing, Intelligence Tests, Kindergarten Children, Primary Education
Smith, Douglas K.; Knudtson, Lenore S. – 1990
The Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (K-ABC) and the Stanford-Binet: Fourth Edition (S-B:FE) were administered in counterbalanced order to a sample of 20 middle-class preschool children (11 males and 9 females) attending the Early Childhood Preschool Center located in a suburban area of a large midwestern city. Subjects' mean age was 4…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, At Risk Persons, Comparative Testing, Correlation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lukens, John – Journal of School Psychology, 1988
Administered the Stanford-Binet, Fourth Edition, to 31 mentally retarded adolescents who had previously been tested with the Stanford-Binet, L-M, with a mean interval between testings of 17.3 months. Found an intertest correlation of .86 and a median intelligence quotient change of three points in either direction. Compatability of scores supports…
Descriptors: Adolescents, Comparative Testing, Intelligence Tests, Mental Retardation
Smith, Douglas K. – 1990
The consistency by which shared abilities are assessed on three intelligence tests was investigated. Instruments under consideration include: the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised, the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children, and the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition. A list of shared abilities and the subtests…
Descriptors: Ability, Child Development, Comparative Testing, Intelligence Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Phelps, LeAdelle – Psychology in the Schools, 1989
Compared Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised (WISC-R) and Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition (SB:FE) in identification and assessment of 48 intellectually gifted students. Findings suggest that scores of SB:FE and WISC-R, while both measuring 'g' factor, produce varying scores for gifted; many children currently in…
Descriptors: Academically Gifted, Adolescents, Children, Comparative Testing
Bower, Anna; Hayes, Alan – American Journal on Mental Retardation, 1995
This study compared global scores of 26 Australian students (ages 4 to 16) with mental retardation on the third and fourth editions of the Stanford Binet Intelligence Scale. Analysis indicated a fairly strong positive relation between the two tests, suggesting that the fourth edition may be substituted for the older instrument in longitudinal…
Descriptors: Comparative Testing, Concurrent Validity, Intelligence Tests, Mental Retardation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Shanahan, Richard; Bradley-Johnson, Sharon – Journal of School Psychology, 1992
Examined concurrent validity of Nonvocal Cognitive Quotient (NVCQ) of Cognitive Abilities Scale (CAS) and Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale: Fourth Edition (Binet IV) for two and three year olds. Found adequate concurrent validity for CAS NVCQ and Binet IV Verbal Comprehension at both age levels as well as for Nonverbal Reasoning/Visualization…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Cognitive Ability, Comparative Testing, Concurrent Validity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Rothlisberg, Barbara A. – Journal of School Psychology, 1987
Examined concurrent validity of Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale, 4th edition (SB IV) and the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised (WISC-R) in a homogeneous, nonexceptional sample of 32 early elementary school children. Findings suggest that SB IV has significant positive relationship with WISC-R. The tests displayed a moderate level…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Comparative Testing, Concurrent Validity, Intelligence Tests
Fagan, Joen; and others – J Consult Clin Psychol, 1969
Reprints from: Joen Fagen, Department of Psychology, Georgia State College, 33 Gilmer Street, S.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30303.
Descriptors: Black Students, Comparative Testing, Correlation, Disadvantaged
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Krohn, Emily J.; Lamp, Robert E. – Journal of School Psychology, 1989
Investigated validity of Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition and Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children with 89 preschool Head Start children from low-income families, using Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale-Form LM as criterion measure. Found some support for concurrent and construct validity of both instruments for use with…
Descriptors: Comparative Testing, Concurrent Validity, Intelligence Tests, Low Income Groups
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Dodge, Robert; And Others – Psychology in the Schools, 1981
Investigated the validities of IQs obtained from independent administration Terman-Merrill (T-M) versus the rescoring method (SF) of the short form of the Stanford-Binet Form L-M. Results indicated that the T-M, depending on test sequence, correlated significantly different with the Full Scale Binet IQ than did the SF rescoring method. (Author)
Descriptors: Comparative Testing, Elementary Education, Elementary School Students, Intelligence Quotient
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Sutton, Geoffrey W.; And Others – Psychology in the Schools, 1982
Compared the derived mental age (MA) of the Stanford-Binet to the test age (TA) of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (Revised) in 100 children. For subjects whose WISC-R scores fell within the TA table, the two were comparable. When extrapolated TAs were required, the scores were not comparable. (Author/JAC)
Descriptors: Comparative Testing, Elementary School Students, Elementary Secondary Education, Intelligence Quotient
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3