NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 14 results Save | Export
Bower, Anna; Hayes, Alan – American Journal on Mental Retardation, 1995
This study compared global scores of 26 Australian students (ages 4 to 16) with mental retardation on the third and fourth editions of the Stanford Binet Intelligence Scale. Analysis indicated a fairly strong positive relation between the two tests, suggesting that the fourth edition may be substituted for the older instrument in longitudinal…
Descriptors: Comparative Testing, Concurrent Validity, Intelligence Tests, Mental Retardation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Rothlisberg, Barbara A. – Journal of School Psychology, 1987
Examined concurrent validity of Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale, 4th edition (SB IV) and the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised (WISC-R) in a homogeneous, nonexceptional sample of 32 early elementary school children. Findings suggest that SB IV has significant positive relationship with WISC-R. The tests displayed a moderate level…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Comparative Testing, Concurrent Validity, Intelligence Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Krohn, Emily J.; Lamp, Robert E. – Journal of School Psychology, 1989
Investigated validity of Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition and Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children with 89 preschool Head Start children from low-income families, using Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale-Form LM as criterion measure. Found some support for concurrent and construct validity of both instruments for use with…
Descriptors: Comparative Testing, Concurrent Validity, Intelligence Tests, Low Income Groups
Smith, Douglas K.; And Others – 1987
The Stanford-Binet: Fourth Edition and Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children were administered in counterbalanced order followed by the Cognitive Domain of the Battelle Developmental Inventory to a sample of 30 nonhandicapped, preschool children (13 males and 17 females). Correlations (corrected for restriction in range) among the three…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Analysis of Variance, Cognitive Ability, Comparative Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lukens, John – Journal of School Psychology, 1988
Administered the Stanford-Binet, Fourth Edition, to 31 mentally retarded adolescents who had previously been tested with the Stanford-Binet, L-M, with a mean interval between testings of 17.3 months. Found an intertest correlation of .86 and a median intelligence quotient change of three points in either direction. Compatability of scores supports…
Descriptors: Adolescents, Comparative Testing, Intelligence Tests, Mental Retardation
Smith, Douglas K. – 1990
The consistency by which shared abilities are assessed on three intelligence tests was investigated. Instruments under consideration include: the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised, the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children, and the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition. A list of shared abilities and the subtests…
Descriptors: Ability, Child Development, Comparative Testing, Intelligence Tests
Lidz, Carol S.; And Others – 1992
The relationship between scores on the cognitive domain of the Battelle Developmental Inventory (BDI) and scores on the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Test (SBIT), Fourth Edition, was studied for 32 urban, low socioeconomic status (SES), African American children (22 males and 10 females) aged 3 to 5 years. The BDI is a developmental inventory…
Descriptors: Black Students, Child Development, Classification, Comparative Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Shanahan, Richard; Bradley-Johnson, Sharon – Journal of School Psychology, 1992
Examined concurrent validity of Nonvocal Cognitive Quotient (NVCQ) of Cognitive Abilities Scale (CAS) and Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale: Fourth Edition (Binet IV) for two and three year olds. Found adequate concurrent validity for CAS NVCQ and Binet IV Verbal Comprehension at both age levels as well as for Nonverbal Reasoning/Visualization…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Cognitive Ability, Comparative Testing, Concurrent Validity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Dodge, Robert; And Others – Psychology in the Schools, 1981
Investigated the validities of IQs obtained from independent administration Terman-Merrill (T-M) versus the rescoring method (SF) of the short form of the Stanford-Binet Form L-M. Results indicated that the T-M, depending on test sequence, correlated significantly different with the Full Scale Binet IQ than did the SF rescoring method. (Author)
Descriptors: Comparative Testing, Elementary Education, Elementary School Students, Intelligence Quotient
Buse, Sylvia T.; McCall, Virgil W. – 1988
The Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale-Revised and the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (K-ABC) were compared using a sample of 26 developmentally disabled children, aged 32 to 73 months. The focus of the study was to determine the feasibility of the K-ABC both for assessment and for planning more effective remediation programs for this…
Descriptors: Cognitive Development, Cognitive Processes, Comparative Testing, Concurrent Validity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Phelps, LeAdelle; And Others – Psychology in the Schools, 1988
Compared Stanford-Binet (Fourth Edition) and the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised as instruments for assessing the intellectual strengths and weaknesses of students (N=35) classified as learning disabled in elementary and secondary grades. Results suggest the tests will yield similar intelligence quotients for the learning disabled…
Descriptors: Comparative Testing, Elementary School Students, Elementary Secondary Education, Intelligence Quotient
Smith, Douglas K.; And Others – 1987
This study investigates the validity of the Stanford Binet Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition (S-B:4) for use with students with learning disabilities. It compares the performance of 18 elementary-age students on the S-B:4 and the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (K-ABC). The subjects were identified by their school as having learning…
Descriptors: Abstract Reasoning, Achievement Tests, Cognitive Processes, Comparative Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Christian, Barry T.; And Others – Psychology in the Schools, 1981
Finds further evidence of the close equivalence of scores derived from the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (Revised) and the Stanford-Binet, but fails to support the practice of computing adjusted mental age scores. Subjects were (N=25) children in the bright normal range of intelligence. (JAC)
Descriptors: Comparative Testing, Diagnostic Tests, Elementary Education, Elementary School Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Stewart, Kenneth D.; Jones, Elvis C. – Psychology in the Schools, 1976
Ten years of validity research concerning the Slosson Intelligence Test (SIT) is reviewed. The equivalence of the SIT to the Stanford-Binet and the Wechsler Scales is examined and the relationship of the SIT to achievement measures is described. (Author)
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Comparative Analysis, Comparative Testing, Evaluation