Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Construct Validity | 3 |
Factor Structure | 3 |
Intelligence Tests | 3 |
Elementary Education | 2 |
Elementary School Students | 2 |
Models | 2 |
Academically Gifted | 1 |
Age Differences | 1 |
Children | 1 |
Factor Analysis | 1 |
Grade 3 | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
McIntosh, David E. | 2 |
Dixon, Felicia | 1 |
Gridley, Betty E. | 1 |
McCallum, R. Steve | 1 |
Newton, Jocelyn H. | 1 |
Williams, Tasha H. | 1 |
Youman, Elizabeth | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Reports - General | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Education | 1 |
Grade 3 | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Stanford Binet Intelligence… | 3 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Williams, Tasha H.; McIntosh, David E.; Dixon, Felicia; Newton, Jocelyn H.; Youman, Elizabeth – Psychology in the Schools, 2010
The Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale, Fifth Edition (SB5), is a recently published, multidimensional measure of intelligence based on Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC) theory. The author of the test provides results from confirmatory factor analyses in the technical manual supporting the five-factor structure of the instrument. Other authors have…
Descriptors: Intelligence Tests, School Psychologists, Construct Validity, Validity

McCallum, R. Steve; And Others – Contemporary Educational Psychology, 1988
Administration of the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale (fourth edition) to 60 elementary school students (in grades four, five, and six) resulted in means consistent with their gifted status. Factor analyses, including LISREL confirmatory analysis, offered only partial support to the Binet model. (TJH)
Descriptors: Academically Gifted, Construct Validity, Elementary Education, Elementary School Students

Gridley, Betty E.; McIntosh, David E. – Journal of School Psychology, 1991
Studied structure of Stanford-Binet: Fourth Edition for normal children who were not part of standardization sample. Found that, for children aged 2-6 years, either 2- or 3-factor model could be supported. For students aged 7-11, neither of 2 models studied was supported. Alternative model with verbal reasoning, quantitative reasoning,…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Children, Construct Validity, Elementary Education