NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20250
Since 20240
Since 2021 (last 5 years)0
Since 2016 (last 10 years)0
Since 2006 (last 20 years)2
Education Level
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 25 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Decker, Scott L.; Englund, Julia A.; Carboni, Jessica A.; Brooks, Janell H. – Psychological Assessment, 2011
Measures of visual-motor integration skills continue to be widely used in psychological assessments with children. However, the construct validity of many visual-motor integration measures remains unclear. In this study, we investigated the relative contributions of maturation and cognitive skills to the development of visual-motor integration…
Descriptors: Construct Validity, Validity, Young Children, Program Effectiveness
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Dell, Cindy Ann; Harrold, Barbara; Dell, Thomas – Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 2008
The Wide Range Achievement Test-Fourth Edition (WRAT4) is designed to provide "a quick, simple, psychometrically sound assessment of academic skills". The test was first published in 1946 by Joseph F. Jastak, with the purpose of augmenting the cognitive performance measures of the Wechsler-Bellevue Scales, developed by David Wechsler.…
Descriptors: Sentences, Spelling, Psychological Evaluation, Academic Achievement
Eaves, Ronald C.; Subotnik, Rena – Diagnostique, 1989
Validity of the Cognitive Levels Test (CLT) was evaluated by correlating test scores of 48 gifted 10-year-olds with scores on the Stanford-Binet intelligence scale as preschoolers as well as with scores from the California Achievement Test. Results indicated high degrees of CLT validity in both measuring cognitive ability and predicting academic…
Descriptors: Aptitude Tests, Comparative Analysis, Elementary Education, Gifted
Hunter, Maxwell W.; Ballash, Joan B. – Diagnostique, 1990
The Slosson Intelligence Test (SIT) and the Stanford-Binet, Fourth Edition (SBIV) were administered to 95 elementary students referred because of either learning problems or potential giftedness. SIT scores predicted SBIV verbal scores more accurately than composite scores. Overall the SIT predicted SBIV scores better for students with learning…
Descriptors: Elementary Education, Gifted, Handicap Identification, Intelligence Quotient
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Spitz, Herman H. – American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1986
For mildly and moderately mentally retarded individuals, the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised measures at about the same level as the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, and, consequently, it also produces much higher IQs than the Wechsler children's scales or the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale, Form L-M, despite high intertest…
Descriptors: Intelligence Quotient, Intelligence Tests, Mild Mental Retardation, Moderate Mental Retardation
Shorr, David N.; And Others – Measurement and Evaluation in Guidance, 1977
Discrepancies between the mental age (MA) scores and the mean performance of chronological age (CA) groups in the latest revision of the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale are noted. A table is presented for converting published Stanford-Binet MA scores into MA scores that are congruent with the above definition. (Author)
Descriptors: Children, Cognitive Development, Intelligence Quotient, Intelligence Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Dodge, Robert; And Others – Psychology in the Schools, 1981
Investigated the validities of IQs obtained from independent administration Terman-Merrill (T-M) versus the rescoring method (SF) of the short form of the Stanford-Binet Form L-M. Results indicated that the T-M, depending on test sequence, correlated significantly different with the Full Scale Binet IQ than did the SF rescoring method. (Author)
Descriptors: Comparative Testing, Elementary Education, Elementary School Students, Intelligence Quotient
Carvajal, Howard; Weaver, Kenneth A. – Diagnostique, 1989
Students in a midwestern public school gifted curricula (n=39) were tested using the Stanford-Binet (SB) Intelligence Scale: Fourth Edition. Correlations with scores from the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised and earlier SB scales were studied. Only the correlation between the SB verbal reasoning standard age scores and the Wechsler…
Descriptors: Aptitude Tests, Comparative Analysis, Elementary Secondary Education, Gifted
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Robinson, Nancy M. – Roeper Review, 1992
This paper presents a rationale for adopting the new form of the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales for use with gifted children, based on its more recent norms, its factorial structure, its less restrictive emphasis on g-factor intelligence and verbal reasoning, and its evenness in content from one age to another. (JDD)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Gifted, Intelligence Quotient, Intelligence Tests
Silverman, Linda; Kearney, Kathi – 1992
This article maintains that the older Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale (Form L-M) is the best tool for assessing extraordinarily gifted children despite the acknowledged deficits of the scale in comparison with newer instruments. Although the article finds that the Stanford-Binet uses outdated terminology, is highly verbal, has 20-year-old norms,…
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Academically Gifted, Elementary Secondary Education, Eligibility
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Harrington, Robert G. – Education, 1982
Suggests improper application of standardized IQ tests may misidentify or underrefer thousands of intellectually gifted students each year. Presents 10 hazards that can bias IQ scores of gifted children and cautions psychological examiners and consumers of IQ test information to be aware of these hazards. (Author/AH)
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Elementary Education, Gifted, Intelligence Quotient
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Silverman, Linda Kreger; Kearney, Katheryn – Roeper Review, 1992
The Stanford-Binet IV is compared to the original version and criticized for having less power to measure the high end of intelligence and for having norms that discriminate against gifted students. Strengths of the Stanford-Binet L-M are pointed out, and use of both scales for different purposes is recommended. (JDD)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Gifted, Intelligence Quotient, Intelligence Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bondy, Andrew S.; And Others – Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1982
A comparison was made between the Slosson Intelligence Test and the McCarthy Scales of Children's Abilities for 44 minority preschoolers. The mean Slosson score was 13.8 points higher than the mean McCarthy score. The correlation between the scores was .81. Effects of inflated Slosson scores for screening purposes are considered. (Author/RD)
Descriptors: Correlation, Intelligence Quotient, Intelligence Tests, Minority Group Children
Hilliard, Asa G., III – Diagnostique, 1989
This paper discusses applications of intelligence tests in schools, considering Binet's original warnings that his tests were primarily useful for identifying students needing intervention and inappropriate for classifying normal students. American applications of Binet's work for ranking are seen as stages of shifting from remedial to custodial…
Descriptors: Aptitude Tests, Elementary Secondary Education, Gifted, Handicap Identification
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Phelps, LeAdelle; And Others – Psychology in the Schools, 1988
Compared Stanford-Binet (Fourth Edition) and the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised as instruments for assessing the intellectual strengths and weaknesses of students (N=35) classified as learning disabled in elementary and secondary grades. Results suggest the tests will yield similar intelligence quotients for the learning disabled…
Descriptors: Comparative Testing, Elementary School Students, Elementary Secondary Education, Intelligence Quotient
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2