Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Source
American Journal on Mental… | 1 |
Autism: The International… | 1 |
Educational Researcher | 1 |
Journal of Psychoeducational… | 1 |
Psychology in the Schools | 1 |
Author
Bearss, Karen | 1 |
Bower, Anna | 1 |
Evans, Andrea N. | 1 |
Fulbrook, Paul | 1 |
Gillespie, Scott | 1 |
Hayes, Alan | 1 |
Herrington, John D. | 1 |
Hollway, Jill | 1 |
Jedrysek, Eleanora | 1 |
Kearney, Kathi | 1 |
Lecavalier, Luc | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 4 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Information Analyses | 1 |
Opinion Papers | 1 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Researchers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Reliability and Validity of the Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale Modified for Autism Spectrum Disorder
Maddox, Brenna B.; Lecavalier, Luc; Miller, Judith S.; Pritchett, Jill; Hollway, Jill; White, Susan W.; Gillespie, Scott; Evans, Andrea N.; Schultz, Robert T.; Herrington, John D.; Bearss, Karen; Scahill, Lawrence – Autism: The International Journal of Research and Practice, 2020
Anxiety often co-occurs with autism spectrum disorder, yet there are few valid and reliable instruments for measuring anxiety in youth with autism spectrum disorder. This article describes the modification of the Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale for youth with autism spectrum disorder and systematic psychometric evaluation in a well-characterized…
Descriptors: Anxiety, Children, Adolescents, Rating Scales
Miles, Sandra; Fulbrook, Paul; Mainwaring-Mägi, Debra – Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 2018
Universal screening of very early school-age children (age 4-7 years) is important for early identification of learning problems that may require enhanced learning opportunity. In this context, use of standardized instruments is critical to obtain valid, reliable, and comparable assessment outcomes. A wide variety of standardized instruments is…
Descriptors: Standardized Tests, Screening Tests, Young Children, Usability
Bower, Anna; Hayes, Alan – American Journal on Mental Retardation, 1995
This study compared global scores of 26 Australian students (ages 4 to 16) with mental retardation on the third and fourth editions of the Stanford Binet Intelligence Scale. Analysis indicated a fairly strong positive relation between the two tests, suggesting that the fourth edition may be substituted for the older instrument in longitudinal…
Descriptors: Comparative Testing, Concurrent Validity, Intelligence Tests, Mental Retardation

Vig, Susan; Jedrysek, Eleanora – Psychology in the Schools, 1996
Reviewed clinical records and test data for 103 children ages 4 to 5 years old who had been tested with the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale, Fourth Edition. Children were tested for multidisciplinary evaluation of developmental problems. Results suggest need for caution in using area score differences or subtest strengths or weaknesses to…
Descriptors: Cognitive Measurement, Language Impairments, Primary Education, Psychometrics

Thorndike, Robert L. – Educational Researcher, 1975
Binet's test, like all other used in education must be judged in terms of its ability to facilitate constructive adaptations of educational programs for individuals. Optimal educational treatment is seen as the challenge for the next 70 years. (AM)
Descriptors: Cognitive Ability, Cognitive Measurement, Educational Quality, Intelligence Differences
Silverman, Linda; Kearney, Kathi – 1992
This article maintains that the older Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale (Form L-M) is the best tool for assessing extraordinarily gifted children despite the acknowledged deficits of the scale in comparison with newer instruments. Although the article finds that the Stanford-Binet uses outdated terminology, is highly verbal, has 20-year-old norms,…
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Academically Gifted, Elementary Secondary Education, Eligibility