NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Dodge, Robert; And Others – Psychology in the Schools, 1981
Investigated the validities of IQs obtained from independent administration Terman-Merrill (T-M) versus the rescoring method (SF) of the short form of the Stanford-Binet Form L-M. Results indicated that the T-M, depending on test sequence, correlated significantly different with the Full Scale Binet IQ than did the SF rescoring method. (Author)
Descriptors: Comparative Testing, Elementary Education, Elementary School Students, Intelligence Quotient
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Sutton, Geoffrey W.; And Others – Psychology in the Schools, 1982
Compared the derived mental age (MA) of the Stanford-Binet to the test age (TA) of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (Revised) in 100 children. For subjects whose WISC-R scores fell within the TA table, the two were comparable. When extrapolated TAs were required, the scores were not comparable. (Author/JAC)
Descriptors: Comparative Testing, Elementary School Students, Elementary Secondary Education, Intelligence Quotient
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Christian, Barry T.; And Others – Psychology in the Schools, 1981
Finds further evidence of the close equivalence of scores derived from the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (Revised) and the Stanford-Binet, but fails to support the practice of computing adjusted mental age scores. Subjects were (N=25) children in the bright normal range of intelligence. (JAC)
Descriptors: Comparative Testing, Diagnostic Tests, Elementary Education, Elementary School Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bloom, Allan S.; And Others – Psychology in the Schools, 1976
WISC-Rs and Stanford-Binets were administered to 50 children with developmental disabilities referred for comprehensive evaluations. Fifty-four percent of the children received different classifications using the two instruments. Different classifications of intellectual level may be derived for the same child depending upon which test is used.…
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Comparative Testing, Elementary Secondary Education, Handicapped Children