Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 4 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 15 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Elementary Education | 2 |
Grade 3 | 1 |
Middle Schools | 1 |
Preschool Education | 1 |
Audience
Researchers | 14 |
Practitioners | 6 |
Location
Tennessee | 2 |
Australia | 1 |
Canada | 1 |
Connecticut | 1 |
Pennsylvania (Philadelphia) | 1 |
Rhode Island | 1 |
Tennessee (Nashville) | 1 |
Turkey | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Fagan, Joseph F., III; McGrath, Susan Krahe – Intelligence, 1981
Statistically significant correlations of .37 and .57 were obtained between infant recognition memory scores obtained at four to seven months and later vocabulary tests of intelligence, for 54 children tested at four and for 39 children seen at seven years, respectively. Obtained values did not vary by sex. (Author/RD)
Descriptors: Infants, Intelligence, Longitudinal Studies, Predictive Validity

Naglieri, Jack A.; Harrison, Patti I. – Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1979
Although the two scores were found to correlate significantly, the mean Index (45.8) was significantly lower than the mean IQ (64.) for this sample--suggesting that one should be cautious when using the McCarthy Index for placement. (Author/DLS)
Descriptors: Cognitive Ability, Elementary Education, Exceptional Child Research, Intelligence

Gridley, Betty E.; McIntosh, David E. – Journal of School Psychology, 1991
Studied structure of Stanford-Binet: Fourth Edition for normal children who were not part of standardization sample. Found that, for children aged 2-6 years, either 2- or 3-factor model could be supported. For students aged 7-11, neither of 2 models studied was supported. Alternative model with verbal reasoning, quantitative reasoning,…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Children, Construct Validity, Elementary Education
Buse, Sylvia T.; McCall, Virgil W. – 1988
The Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale-Revised and the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (K-ABC) were compared using a sample of 26 developmentally disabled children, aged 32 to 73 months. The focus of the study was to determine the feasibility of the K-ABC both for assessment and for planning more effective remediation programs for this…
Descriptors: Cognitive Development, Cognitive Processes, Comparative Testing, Concurrent Validity

Harrington, Robert G. – Education, 1982
Suggests improper application of standardized IQ tests may misidentify or underrefer thousands of intellectually gifted students each year. Presents 10 hazards that can bias IQ scores of gifted children and cautions psychological examiners and consumers of IQ test information to be aware of these hazards. (Author/AH)
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Elementary Education, Gifted, Intelligence Quotient

Silverman, Linda Kreger; Kearney, Katheryn – Roeper Review, 1992
The Stanford-Binet IV is compared to the original version and criticized for having less power to measure the high end of intelligence and for having norms that discriminate against gifted students. Strengths of the Stanford-Binet L-M are pointed out, and use of both scales for different purposes is recommended. (JDD)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Gifted, Intelligence Quotient, Intelligence Tests

Wilson, William M. – Mental Retardation, 1992
This article concludes that the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale: Fourth Edition is poorly suited for assessment of children less than five years old with possible mild mental retardation and for persons of any age with possible severe mental retardation. The continued use of Form L-M is recommended for these populations. (Author/DB)
Descriptors: Clinical Diagnosis, Handicap Identification, Intelligence Tests, Measures (Individuals)

Laurent, Jeff; And Others – Psychological Assessment, 1992
Validity studies conducted with the Stanford Binet Intelligence Scale: Fourth Edition (SB:FE) are reviewed. Results support its validity as a measure of general mental ability and that it can distinguish between groups of youngsters with differing intellectual abilities. Recommendations are made for use of the SB:FE. (SLD)
Descriptors: Children, Factor Analysis, Factor Structure, Intelligence
Armstrong, Robert J.; And Others – 1971
This study was concerned with determining the validity of the Slosson Intelligence Test (SIT) using the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale (S-B), Form L-M as the validity criterion. The sample consisted of 724 students enrolled in 10 public school systems in northeastern Massachusetts. Using the Pearson-Product Moment formula a coefficient of…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Correlation, Intelligence Tests, Public Schools

Dube, Gary G.; Rudolph, Jeffrey A. – Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1978
Assesses the concurrent validity of the Vane Kindergarten Test with low socioeconomic status black preschool children with the Stanford-Binet as the external criterion. Also examines its feasibility with children below the age of 4 1/2. (Author/RK)
Descriptors: Age, Clinical Psychology, Disadvantaged, Intelligence Tests

Bondy, Andrew S.; And Others – Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1982
A comparison was made between the Slosson Intelligence Test and the McCarthy Scales of Children's Abilities for 44 minority preschoolers. The mean Slosson score was 13.8 points higher than the mean McCarthy score. The correlation between the scores was .81. Effects of inflated Slosson scores for screening purposes are considered. (Author/RD)
Descriptors: Correlation, Intelligence Quotient, Intelligence Tests, Minority Group Children
Hilliard, Asa G., III – Diagnostique, 1989
This paper discusses applications of intelligence tests in schools, considering Binet's original warnings that his tests were primarily useful for identifying students needing intervention and inappropriate for classifying normal students. American applications of Binet's work for ranking are seen as stages of shifting from remedial to custodial…
Descriptors: Aptitude Tests, Elementary Secondary Education, Gifted, Handicap Identification

Phelps, LeAdelle; And Others – Psychology in the Schools, 1988
Compared Stanford-Binet (Fourth Edition) and the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised as instruments for assessing the intellectual strengths and weaknesses of students (N=35) classified as learning disabled in elementary and secondary grades. Results suggest the tests will yield similar intelligence quotients for the learning disabled…
Descriptors: Comparative Testing, Elementary School Students, Elementary Secondary Education, Intelligence Quotient
Carvajal, Howard; And Others – Diagnostique, 1989
Forty-five gifted children, ages 11-17, were tested with the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale and the Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Achievement. Results indicated 18 of 20 correlations between the area and composite scores were significant. The Stanford-Binet Short-Term Memory standard age score mean was lower than other scores' means. (Author/JDD)
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Achievement Tests, Comparative Analysis, Correlation

Ellzey, John; Karnes, Frances A. – Rural Special Education Quarterly, 1993
For 40 gifted students, the mean Full Scale score of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised was 13.52 points higher than the mean composite score of the Stanford-Binet, Fourth Edition (Binet-IV). Between the two instruments, 11 of 15 possible subscale correlations were significant. Use of the Binet-IV might result in placement of…
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Gifted, Intelligence Quotient, Intelligence Tests