Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Cognitive Ability | 1 |
| College Students | 1 |
| Color | 1 |
| Conflict | 1 |
| Correlation | 1 |
| Error Patterns | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| Interference (Learning) | 1 |
| Item Analysis | 1 |
| Learning Processes | 1 |
| Naming | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Journal of Experimental… | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Canada | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Stroop Color Word Test | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkSpinelli, Giacomo; Lupker, Stephen J. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2021
In the Stroop task, congruency effects (i.e., the color-naming latency difference between incongruent stimuli, e.g., the word BLUE written in the color red, and congruent stimuli, e.g., RED in red) are smaller in a list in which incongruent trials are frequent than in a list in which incongruent trials are infrequent. The traditional explanation…
Descriptors: Color, Interference (Learning), Visual Stimuli, Reaction Time
