Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Color | 2 |
Error Patterns | 2 |
Foreign Countries | 2 |
Interference (Learning) | 2 |
Naming | 2 |
Reaction Time | 2 |
Visual Stimuli | 2 |
Cognitive Ability | 1 |
College Students | 1 |
Comparative Analysis | 1 |
Conflict | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Journal of Experimental… | 2 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 2 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 2 |
Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Stroop Color Word Test | 2 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Spinelli, Giacomo; Lupker, Stephen J. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2021
In the Stroop task, congruency effects (i.e., the color-naming latency difference between incongruent stimuli, e.g., the word BLUE written in the color red, and congruent stimuli, e.g., RED in red) are smaller in a list in which incongruent trials are frequent than in a list in which incongruent trials are infrequent. The traditional explanation…
Descriptors: Color, Interference (Learning), Visual Stimuli, Reaction Time
Kinoshita, Sachiko; De Wit, Bianca; Norris, Dennis – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2017
In 2 variants of the color-word Stroop task, we compared 5 types of color-neutral distractors--real words (e.g., "HAT"), pseudowords (e.g., "HIX"), consonant strings (e.g., "HDK"), symbol strings (e.g., #$%), and a row of Xs (e.g., "XXX")--as well as incongruent color words (e.g., "GREEN" displayed…
Descriptors: Color, Interference (Learning), Reaction Time, Visual Stimuli