Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| English (Second Language) | 2 |
| Grammar | 2 |
| Language Tests | 2 |
| Syntax | 2 |
| Writing Evaluation | 2 |
| Computational Linguistics | 1 |
| Computer Assisted Testing | 1 |
| Correlation | 1 |
| Discourse Analysis | 1 |
| Essay Tests | 1 |
| Evaluation Research | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Baba, Kyoko | 1 |
| Cumming, Alister | 1 |
| Eouanzoui, Keanre | 1 |
| Erdosy, Usman | 1 |
| James, Mark | 1 |
| Kantor, Robert | 1 |
| Lu, Xiaofei | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Test of English as a Foreign… | 2 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkLu, Xiaofei – Language Testing, 2017
Research investigating corpora of English learners' language raises new questions about how syntactic complexity is defined theoretically and operationally for second language (L2) writing assessment. I show that syntactic complexity is important in construct definitions and L2 writing rating scales as well as in L2 writing research. I describe…
Descriptors: Syntax, Computational Linguistics, Second Language Learning, Writing Research
Cumming, Alister; Kantor, Robert; Baba, Kyoko; Erdosy, Usman; Eouanzoui, Keanre; James, Mark – Assessing Writing, 2005
We assessed whether and how the discourse written for prototype integrated tasks (involving writing in response to print or audio source texts) field tested for Next Generation TOEFL[R] differs from the discourse written for independent essays (i.e., the TOEFL Essay[R]). We selected 216 compositions written for six tasks by 36 examinees in a field…
Descriptors: Grammar, Field Tests, English (Second Language), Pragmatics
