Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 1 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 2 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 3 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 5 |
Descriptor
English (Second Language) | 5 |
Language Tests | 5 |
Second Language Learning | 4 |
Bias | 2 |
Dialects | 2 |
Evaluators | 2 |
Familiarity | 2 |
Oral Language | 2 |
Pronunciation | 2 |
Test Bias | 2 |
Audiovisual Aids | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Language Testing | 5 |
Author
Allen, David | 1 |
Gass, Susan | 1 |
Kang, Okim | 1 |
Kermad, Alyssa | 1 |
Kunnan, Antony John | 1 |
Michael D. Carey | 1 |
Myford, Carol | 1 |
Nakamura, Keita | 1 |
Rubin, Don | 1 |
Stefan Szocs | 1 |
Winke, Paula | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 5 |
Reports - Research | 4 |
Opinion Papers | 1 |
Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 1 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Test of English as a Foreign… | 5 |
International English… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Michael D. Carey; Stefan Szocs – Language Testing, 2024
This controlled experimental study investigated the interaction of variables associated with rating the pronunciation component of high-stakes English-language-speaking tests such as IELTS and TOEFL iBT. One hundred experienced raters who were all either familiar or unfamiliar with Brazilian-accented English or Papua New Guinean Tok Pisin-accented…
Descriptors: Dialects, Pronunciation, Suprasegmentals, Familiarity
Allen, David; Nakamura, Keita – Language Testing, 2023
Although there is abundant evidence for the use of first-language (L1) knowledge by bilinguals when using a second language (L2), investigation into the impact of L1 knowledge in large-scale L2 language assessments and discussion of how such impact may be controlled has received little attention in the language assessment literature. This study…
Descriptors: Language Tests, Second Language Learning, Contrastive Linguistics, English (Second Language)
Kang, Okim; Rubin, Don; Kermad, Alyssa – Language Testing, 2019
As a result of the fact that judgments of non-native speech are closely tied to social biases, oral proficiency ratings are susceptible to error because of rater background and social attitudes. In the present study we seek first to estimate the variance attributable to rater background and attitudinal variables on novice raters' assessments of L2…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Second Language Learning, Language Tests, English (Second Language)
Winke, Paula; Gass, Susan; Myford, Carol – Language Testing, 2013
Based on evidence that listeners may favor certain foreign accents over others (Gass & Varonis, 1984; Major, Fitzmaurice, Bunta, & Balasubramanian, 2002; Tauroza & Luk, 1997) and that language-test raters may better comprehend and/or rate the speech of test takers whose native languages (L1s) are more familiar on some level (Carey,…
Descriptors: Native Language, Bias, Dialects, Pronunciation
Kunnan, Antony John – Language Testing, 2010
This paper presents the author's response to Xiaoming Xi's article titled "How do we go about investigating test fairness?" In this response, the author focuses on test fairness and Toulmin's model of argument structure, Xi's proposal, and the challenges the proposal brings. Xi proposes an approach to investigating test fairness to guide…
Descriptors: Persuasive Discourse, Inferences, Test Bias, Models