Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Automation | 3 |
Correlation | 3 |
English (Second Language) | 3 |
Language Tests | 3 |
Scoring | 3 |
Second Language Learning | 3 |
Essays | 2 |
Scoring Rubrics | 2 |
Writing Skills | 2 |
Audio Equipment | 1 |
Children | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Blanchard, Daniel | 1 |
Crossley, Scott A. | 1 |
Evanini, Keelan | 1 |
Guo, Liang | 1 |
Heilman, Michael | 1 |
McNamara, Danielle S. | 1 |
Wang, Xinhao | 1 |
Weigle, Sara Cushing | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 1 |
Junior High Schools | 1 |
Middle Schools | 1 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Test of English as a Foreign… | 3 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Guo, Liang; Crossley, Scott A.; McNamara, Danielle S. – Grantee Submission, 2013
This study explores whether linguistic features can predict second language writing proficiency in the Test of English as a Foreign Language (TOEFL iBT) integrated and independent writing tasks and, if so, whether there are differences and similarities in the two sets of predictive linguistic features. Linguistic features related to lexical…
Descriptors: English (Second Language), Linguistics, Second Language Learning, Writing Skills
Evanini, Keelan; Heilman, Michael; Wang, Xinhao; Blanchard, Daniel – ETS Research Report Series, 2015
This report describes the initial automated scoring results that were obtained using the constructed responses from the Writing and Speaking sections of the pilot forms of the "TOEFL Junior"® Comprehensive test administered in late 2011. For all of the items except one (the edit item in the Writing section), existing automated scoring…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Automation, Language Tests, Second Language Learning
Weigle, Sara Cushing – ETS Research Report Series, 2011
Automated scoring has the potential to dramatically reduce the time and costs associated with the assessment of complex skills such as writing, but its use must be validated against a variety of criteria for it to be accepted by test users and stakeholders. This study addresses two validity-related issues regarding the use of e-rater® with the…
Descriptors: Scoring, English (Second Language), Second Language Instruction, Automation