NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Silverstein, A. B. – Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1985
Reports the validities and reliabilities of two short forms of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (Revised) (Vocabulary and Block Design, and Arithmetic and Picture Arrangement) for each of nine age groups, together with standard errors of estimate and measurement. Results support the use of these forms for their intended purpose. (BH)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Test Reliability, Test Validity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Evans, Ronald G. – Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1985
Rescored Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (Revised) protocols from 81 normal adults using the Satz Mogel short form procedure. Low correlations between the short forms and full protocols suggest the Satz Mogel procedure can serve only as a gross screening test with normal adults. (JAC)
Descriptors: Adults, Predictive Validity, Scoring, Screening Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Axelrod, Bradley N.; Paolo, Anthony M. – Psychological Assessment, 1998
Full scale IQ (FSIQ) scores, followed by verbal (VIQ) and performance (PIQ) IQ scores, demonstrated the highest comparability between WAIS-R and its seven subtest form when tested with 1,880 subjects from the standardization sample. Correlations between versions were consistently lower for PIQ than FSIQ and VIQ. Age grouping did not affect…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Concurrent Validity, Intelligence Quotient, Performance Based Assessment
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Haynes, Jack P. – Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1985
Investigated validity of two- and four-subtest combinations as estimates of Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised (WAIS-R) Full Scale IQ among clients of low IQ (N=100). Concluded that the four-subtest form was superior as a screening device when complete administration of the WAIS-R is not feasible. (NRB)
Descriptors: Adults, Intelligence Tests, Mild Mental Retardation, Screening Tests