Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Foreign Countries | 3 |
Comparative Analysis | 2 |
Construct Validity | 2 |
Intelligence | 2 |
Measures (Individuals) | 2 |
Scores | 2 |
Cognitive Ability | 1 |
Cross Cultural Studies | 1 |
Differences | 1 |
Factor Analysis | 1 |
Generalization | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Saklofske, Donald H. | 3 |
Weiss, Lawrence G. | 3 |
Bowden, Stephen C. | 2 |
Beal, A. Lynne | 1 |
Holdnack, James A. | 1 |
Miller, Jessie L. | 1 |
Zhu, Jianjun | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Canada | 3 |
United States | 3 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Wechsler Adult Intelligence… | 3 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Miller, Jessie L.; Weiss, Lawrence G.; Beal, A. Lynne; Saklofske, Donald H.; Zhu, Jianjun; Holdnack, James A. – Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 2015
It is well established that Canadians produce higher raw scores than their U.S. counterparts on intellectual assessments. As a result of these differences in ability along with smaller variability in the population's intellectual performance, Canadian normative data will yield lower standard scores for most raw score points compared to U.S. norms.…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Intelligence Tests, Test Norms, Raw Scores
Bowden, Stephen C.; Saklofske, Donald H.; Weiss, Lawrence G. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2011
A measurement model describes both the numerical and theoretical relationship between observed scores and the corresponding latent variables or constructs. Testing a measurement model across groups is required to determine if the tests scores are tapping the same constructs so that the same meaning can be ascribed to the scores. Contemporary tests…
Descriptors: Intelligence, Construct Validity, Measurement, Measures (Individuals)
Bowden, Stephen C.; Saklofske, Donald H.; Weiss, Lawrence G. – Assessment, 2011
Examination of measurement invariance provides a powerful method to evaluate the hypothesis that the same set of psychological constructs underlies a set of test scores in different populations. If measurement invariance is observed, then the same psychological meaning can be ascribed to scores in both populations. In this study, the measurement…
Descriptors: Intelligence, Construct Validity, Older Adults, Measures (Individuals)