Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Cognitive Ability | 1 |
| Competence | 1 |
| Court Litigation | 1 |
| Deception | 1 |
| Interviews | 1 |
| Males | 1 |
| Measures (Individuals) | 1 |
| Patients | 1 |
| Psychological Evaluation | 1 |
| Psychopathology | 1 |
| Response Style (Tests) | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Assessment | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Wechsler Adult Intelligence… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkVitacco, Michael J.; Rogers, Richard; Gabel, Jason – Assessment, 2009
Forensic clinicians have the option of employing well-validated structured interviews when conducting competency to stand trial (CST) evaluations to ensure adequate coverage of the three prongs delineated in "Dusky v. United States". This study evaluates the effects of feigning on the Evaluation of Competency to Stand Trial-Revised…
Descriptors: Males, Patients, Court Litigation, Competence
