NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Audience
Researchers1
Location
India1
New York1
Laws, Policies, & Programs
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing all 11 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jyoti Sharma; B. Biswal; Pankaj Tyagi; Shobha Bagai – Gifted and Talented International, 2024
Academically gifted students or high potential learners don't feel challenged in regular classrooms. Teachers in schools are also not quipped with pedagogical interventions to meet the advanced learning needs of gifted students. Mentoring is considered an effective method to guide, motivate and optimize learning abilities of gifted students. The…
Descriptors: Mentors, Academically Gifted, Program Development, Science Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Andersen, Lori – Roeper Review, 2014
Visual-spatial ability is a multifaceted component of intelligence that has predictive validity for future achievement in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) occupations. Although identification and development of STEM talent is a national priority, visual-spatial ability is rarely measured and relatively neglected in gifted…
Descriptors: Visual Perception, Spatial Ability, Intelligence, STEM Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Parkin, Jason R.; Beaujean, A. Alexander – Journal of School Psychology, 2012
This study used structural equation modeling to examine the effect of Stratum III (i.e., general intelligence) and Stratum II (i.e., Comprehension-Knowledge, Fluid Reasoning, Short-Term Memory, Processing Speed, and Visual Processing) factors of the Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC) cognitive abilities, as operationalized by the Wechsler Intelligence…
Descriptors: Intelligence, Structural Equation Models, Achievement Tests, Measures (Individuals)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kuentzel, Jeffrey G.; Hetterscheidt, Lesley A.; Barnett, Douglas – Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 2011
The rigors of standardized testing make for numerous opportunities for examiner error, including simple computational mistakes in scoring. Although experts recommend that test scoring be double-checked, the extent to which independent double-checking would reduce scoring errors is not known. A double-checking procedure was established at a…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Intelligence, Testing, Standardized Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Cohen, Arie; Fiorello, Catherine A.; Farley, Frank H. – Intelligence, 2006
A previous study on the underlying structure of the Wechsler intelligence test (WISC-R; [Wechsler, D. (1974). Manual WISC-R: Wechsler intelligence scale for children-Revised. New York: Psychological Corporation]), using smallest space analysis (SSA) [Guttman, L., and Levy, S. (1991). Two structural laws for intelligence tests.…
Descriptors: Intelligence, Intelligence Tests, Children, Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Donders, Jacques – Assessment, 1997
The criterion validity of the factor index scores of the third edition of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC-III) was evaluated in a sample of 88 children with traumatic head injury. Only the Perceptual Organization and Processing Speed scores demonstrated acceptable sensitivity to injury severity for evaluation use. (SLD)
Descriptors: Children, Evaluation Methods, Factor Analysis, Factor Structure
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Sachs, David A. – American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1971
Descriptors: Behavior Change, Evaluation Methods, Exceptional Child Research, Intelligence
Seagle, Donna L.; Rust, James O. – 1996
The Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test (K-BIT) was used as a screening instrument to predict Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Third Edition (WISC-III) scores of 94 students referred for psychoeducational evaluations. Although the correlation coefficient between the K-BIT IQ Composite and the WISC-III Full Scale IQ was 0.771 for the entire…
Descriptors: Academically Gifted, Children, Correlation, Criteria
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Edelman, Steve – Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 1996
The third edition of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC-III) is reviewed. A comparison of the WISC-III with the Weschler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised (WISC-R) is included. Discusses shortcomings of the WISC-III while noting that overall, there are substantial improvements in the WISC-III over the WISC-R. (KW)
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Aptitude Tests, Children, Comparative Analysis
Davis, Brandon; And Others – 1989
The position that intelligence and achievement are essentially different measures of the same construct has often been referred to as a "jangle fallacy." Such a position challenges the present practice of placing children in learning disabilities programs based on a discrepancy between Intelligence Quotient (IQ) and achievement. This…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Educational Diagnosis, Educational Practices, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hagie, Marilyn Urquhart; Gallipo, Peggy L.; Svien, Lana – Assessment for Effective Intervention, 2003
The Bayley Scales of Infant Development II (BSID-II) and the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Third Edition (WISC-III) are frequently used across cultures in standard assessment batteries for learners between 6 and 17 years of age, respectively. Responses of American Indian students on the BSID-II and WISC-III were examined for patterns of…
Descriptors: Test Bias, Intelligence, Test Items, American Indians