Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Author
| Allor, Jill H. | 3 |
| Cheatham, Jennifer P. | 3 |
| Lindo, Endia J. | 2 |
| Weiser, Beverly | 2 |
| Al Otaiba, Stephanie | 1 |
| Mathes, Patricia G. | 1 |
| Roberts, J. Kyle | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Research | 3 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Dynamic Indicators of Basic… | 3 |
| Woodcock Language Proficiency… | 3 |
| Peabody Picture Vocabulary… | 1 |
| Wechsler Individual… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Does not meet standards | 1 |
Peer reviewed
Download full text
Direct linkLindo, Endia J.; Weiser, Beverly; Cheatham, Jennifer P.; Allor, Jill H. – Grantee Submission, 2018
This study examines the effectiveness of minimally trained tutors providing a highly structured tutoring intervention for struggling readers. We screened students in Grades K-6 for participation in an after-school tutoring program. We randomly assigned those students not meeting the benchmark on a reading screening measure to either a tutoring…
Descriptors: After School Programs, After School Education, Literacy, Tutoring
Lindo, Endia J.; Weiser, Beverly; Cheatham, Jennifer P.; Allor, Jill H. – Reading & Writing Quarterly, 2018
This study examines the effectiveness of minimally trained tutors providing a highly structured tutoring intervention for struggling readers. We screened students in Grades K-6 for participation in an after-school tutoring program. We randomly assigned those students not meeting the benchmark on a reading screening measure to either a tutoring…
Descriptors: After School Programs, After School Education, Literacy, Tutoring
Allor, Jill H.; Mathes, Patricia G.; Roberts, J. Kyle; Cheatham, Jennifer P.; Al Otaiba, Stephanie – Exceptional Children, 2014
This longitudinal randomized-control trial investigated the effectiveness of scientifically based reading instruction for students with IQs ranging from 40 to 80, including students with intellectual disability (ID). Students were randomly assigned into treatment (n = 76) and contrast (n = 65) groups. Students in the treatment group received…
Descriptors: Reading Instruction, Instructional Effectiveness, Intelligence Quotient, Intelligence Differences
