Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| COVID-19 | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Computer Assisted Instruction | 1 |
| Computer Software | 1 |
| Cost Effectiveness | 1 |
| Costs | 1 |
| Decision Making | 1 |
| Educational Theories | 1 |
| Elementary School Students | 1 |
| Equal Education | 1 |
| Grade 5 | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Society for Research on… | 1 |
Author
| Matthew E. Foster | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Early Childhood Education | 1 |
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Grade 5 | 1 |
| Intermediate Grades | 1 |
| Kindergarten | 1 |
| Middle Schools | 1 |
| Primary Education | 1 |
Audience
| Administrators | 1 |
| Policymakers | 1 |
Location
| Florida | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkMatthew E. Foster – Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2021
Background/Context: Despite the surge in efficacy studies, a recent meta-analysis indicates that the relative effectiveness of any two math interventions is largely unknown (Nelson & McMaster, 2019). Additionally, policy makers rarely choose educational programs based on an assessment of costs and cost-effectiveness (Hollands et al., 2016;…
Descriptors: Costs, Cost Effectiveness, Mathematics Instruction, Numeracy
