NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Evaluating a Construction Product: Timing Is Critical.
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Brooks, Kenneth W. – CEFP Journal, 1985
This author recommends a comprehensive evalution of education construction projects 11 months following their substantial completion, when users have had sufficient time to identify true weaknesses, original intentions have not been forgotten, shortcomings in materials or the construction process will have appeared, and one year warranties have…
Descriptors: Design Requirements, Educational Facilities, Equipment Evaluation, Evaluation
Integrate Evaluation into the Planning Process.
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Camp, William – CEFP Journal, 1985
In an attempt to correct for limitations in the Program Evaluation and Review Technique-Critical Path Method (PERT-CPM), the Graphical Evaluation and Review Technique (GERT) has been developed. This management tool allows for evaluation during the facilities' development process. Two figures and two references are provided. (DCS)
Descriptors: Critical Path Method, Educational Facilities Planning, Formative Evaluation, Management Systems
Why Schools Choose Construction Managers.
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hultgren, Steve – CEFP Journal, 1985
A construction manager can relieve administrators of much of their uncertainty in building or renovating schools in the areas of scheduling, quality, and costs. (MLF)
Descriptors: Construction Management, Elementary Secondary Education, Facility Guidelines, Interprofessional Relationship
Evaluating the Completed Project.
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Earthman, Glen I. – CEFP Journal, 1985
This article on the purposes, process, frequency, and instruments of educational facility evaluation emphasizes the importance of obtaining data on the effect a facility has upon its users. Four references are provided. (DCS)
Descriptors: Design Requirements, Educational Change, Educational Environment, Educational Facilities