Publication Date
| In 2025 | 1 |
| Since 2024 | 1 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 7 |
Descriptor
Source
| State Educational Technology… | 5 |
| American Association of… | 1 |
| Journal of Science Education… | 1 |
| Principal Leadership | 1 |
| Technology, Pedagogy and… | 1 |
Author
| Lemke, Cheryl | 3 |
| Banyard, Phil | 1 |
| Bowyer, Jane B. | 1 |
| C. Edward Watson | 1 |
| Gerard, Libby F. | 1 |
| Gosmire, Doreen | 1 |
| Grady, Marilyn L. | 1 |
| Haning, Nicole | 1 |
| Lee Rainie | 1 |
| Linn, Marcia C. | 1 |
| Martin, Crystal | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 7 |
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Guides - Non-Classroom | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Secondary Education | 7 |
| Secondary Education | 2 |
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
| Administrators | 9 |
| Policymakers | 6 |
| Teachers | 2 |
Location
| United Kingdom | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Elementary and Secondary… | 5 |
| No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 5 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Download full textC. Edward Watson; Lee Rainie – American Association of Colleges and Universities, 2025
The rise of generative artificial intelligence systems is impacting teaching and learning at every level of education. In particular, colleges and universities are working hard to understand and adapt to advanced computer tools that pose challenges to some of the foundational structures of education. The immensity of this disruption is captured in…
Descriptors: Influence of Technology, Artificial Intelligence, Higher Education, Universities
Peer reviewed
Direct linkGerard, Libby F.; Bowyer, Jane B.; Linn, Marcia C. – Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2008
Reforms such as technology-enhanced instruction require principal leadership. Yet, many principals report that they need help to guide implementation of science and technology reforms. We identify strategies for helping principals provide this leadership. A two-phase design is employed. In the first phase we elicit principals' varied ideas about…
Descriptors: Educational Change, Principals, Technology Integration, Technology Education
Underwood, Jean; Banyard, Phil – Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 2008
The opening premise of this paper is that education must change but that the nature and direction of that change is uncertain. In England, but not necessarily the UK as a whole, the policy is to produce a more personalised learning experience for all pupils. The policy of personalisation is to be delivered in part by increased use of digital…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Educational Policy, Student Attitudes, Teacher Attitudes
Gosmire, Doreen; Grady, Marilyn L. – Principal Leadership, 2007
Technology expenditures and usage in schools have risen by nearly 300 percent during the last three decades. Few principals claim to be technology experts, but most aspire to design a map that leads their schools to success with educational technology. The key to success on the journey is not to know everything, but to ask the right questions.…
Descriptors: Principals, Educational Technology, Technology Integration, Educational Trends
State Educational Technology Directors Association, 2008
The State Educational Technology Directors Association (SETDA) is pleased to release its fifth annual National Trends Report on the use of federal funds to support educational technology. This report documents findings from Round 5 (FY 06) of the No Child Left Behind, Title II, Part D, Enhancing Education Through Technology (NCLB IID) program. The…
Descriptors: Educational Practices, Retrenchment, Electronic Learning, Web Based Instruction
Lemke, Cheryl; Vandersall, Kirk; Ravden, Daran – State Educational Technology Directors Association, 2004
In the fall of 2003, the State Educational Technology Directors Association (SETDA) commissioned the Metiri Group to conduct a national survey on the first year of implementation of the No Child Left Behind, Title II, Part D, Enhancing Education through Technology program. The findings in this report represent 46 states and the District of…
Descriptors: Educational Technology, Technology Uses in Education, Technology Integration, Grants
Lemke, Cheryl; Sayavong, Phoumy; Martin, Crystal – State Educational Technology Directors Association, 2005
The State Educational Technology Directors Association (SETDA) is pleased to present the findings of the second annual National Trends Report. SETDA commissioned the Metiri Group for a second consecutive year to conduct a national survey in the fall of 2004 on the second year implementation of the No Child Left Behind, Title II, Part D, Enhancing…
Descriptors: Educational Trends, State Policy, Sustainability, Innovation
State Educational Technology Directors Association, 2007
The State Educational Technology Directors Association (SETDA) is pleased to release its fourth annual National Trends Report on the use of federal funds to support educational technology. This report documents findings from Round 4 (FY 05) of the No Child Left Behind, Title II Part D, Enhancing Education Through Technology (NCLB II D) program.…
Descriptors: Educational Technology, Evidence, Grants, School Districts
Lemke, Cheryl; Wainer, Andrew; Haning, Nicole – State Educational Technology Directors Association, 2006
The State Educational Technology Directors Association is pleased to release its third annual Trends Report on educational technology. In addition to reporting trends on the third round (FY 04) of the No Child Left Behind, Title II, Part D, Enhancing Education Through Technology (EETT) program, the 2006 report also includes general state policy…
Descriptors: Outcome Measures, Program Evaluation, Educational Research, Access to Computers
