NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing 1 to 15 of 20 results Save | Export
Reitan, Cheryl – Currents, 1998
Colleges and universities should critically review their publications periodically to save money and also as a way to present a more cohesive institutional identity. Ten recommendations are made for conducting a productive publications audit; they include choosing an evaluation method, selecting participants, making the experience pleasant, and…
Descriptors: College Administration, Comparative Analysis, Evaluation Methods, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Machung, Anne – Change, 1998
The "U.S. News and World Report" rankings of colleges do not affect institutions equally; the schools impacted most are those that have the most to lose because they benefit from, even rely on, the rankings for prestige and visibility. The magazine relies on the rankings for substantial sales revenues, and has garnered considerable power…
Descriptors: College Administration, College Choice, Comparative Analysis, Higher Education
Christ, Rick – Currents, 1998
College and university fund raisers are encouraged to test various strategies for direct-mail solicitation by comparing variations of five factors that influence direct mail response: copy; timing; package; offer; and list. Suggestions include forming a hypothesis, testing one variable at a time, choosing test and control groups carefully,…
Descriptors: College Administration, Comparative Analysis, Donors, Fund Raising
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Taylor, Raymond E.; Darling, John R. – Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 1991
A study investigated the attitudes of 111 college deans toward marketing in higher education, especially as they relate to the deans' academic fields (pure vs. applied). Results indicated no significant differences between the groups' perceptions and that, in general, deans support marketing but not that marketing improves educational quality.…
Descriptors: Administrator Attitudes, College Administration, Comparative Analysis, Deans
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Mallette, Bruce I. – New Directions for Institutional Research, 1995
Examination of popular publications that rate and rank collegiate undergraduate education reveals several methodological concerns. The challenges for consumers and researchers are to know what shortcomings exist in these ratings, what impact the shortcomings have on the rankings, and what methodological changes might improve the evaluations.…
Descriptors: College Administration, College Choice, Comparative Analysis, Higher Education
Thinesen, Sarah A. – Currents, 1993
The author of a survey of 254 college public relations officers (HE 531 785) describes briefly the underlying definitions, design, and results of the study, and makes comparisons between this and an earlier study of college presidents. Discussion of methodology focuses on respondent characteristics and consistency of definition. (MSE)
Descriptors: Administrator Attitudes, Administrator Role, College Administration, College Presidents
Hincker, Larry – Currents, 1999
Four basic models of the organization of college and university communications offices are described: advancement, news bureau model, agency, and marketing models. Pros and cons of each are discussed, and the structure of this function at the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (Virginia Tech) is presented as an ideal…
Descriptors: Administrative Organization, College Administration, Comparative Analysis, Fund Raising
Stephen, Arthur – Currents, 1999
Describes the way in which Wilfrid Laurier University (Ontario), an institution that had worked hard to improve its programs and reputation, addressed a disappointing ranking in a national news magazine. In cooperation with other educators, administrators, and institutional researchers, the university undertook a successful project to have the…
Descriptors: Case Studies, Change Strategies, College Administration, Comparative Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Morse, Robert J.; Gilbert, Jersey – New Directions for Institutional Research, 1995
Two representatives of popular magazines that publish controversial rankings of colleges and universities respond to criticism of the rankings. Issues addressed include the need for third-party comparisons, the importance of institutional reputation, cooperation with the higher education community, changing methodology, data integrity, reader…
Descriptors: College Administration, College Choice, Comparative Analysis, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Machung, Anne – New Directions for Institutional Research, 1995
Response of colleges and universities to surveys from publishers of college guides and popular newsstand magazines is discussed, and considerations in developing a standard survey response are explored. These include the advantages and limitations of standardized information formats, how much of the information reaches prospective students, how…
Descriptors: College Administration, College Choice, Comparative Analysis, Guides
Simpson, Kristen – Currents, 1998
In an interview, the managing editor of a major publication in higher education explains what the media want to know about such issues as college and program rankings, affirmative action, college costs, crime on campus, and how colleges can communicate their positions better, make their messages more coherent, and influence the opinions of both…
Descriptors: Affirmative Action, College Environment, Comparative Analysis, Crime
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hoeritz, Kimberley; And Others – New Directions for Institutional Research, 1995
Four major publishers of college guidebooks respond to the concerns of colleges and universities about the guides, the information they contain, and the demand for the information. Specific issues addressed include development of a standardized survey response, data integrity and validity, specialized information needs, publisher-institution…
Descriptors: College Administration, College Choice, Comparative Analysis, Guides
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hunter, Bruce – New Directions for Institutional Research, 1995
An overview of college guidebooks examines their origins, development, types, impact on both consumers and colleges, and current trends and future prospects. It is argued that publishers will gain credibility by standardizing data collection and reporting formats and by no longer trying to rank colleges on criteria that change annually and fail to…
Descriptors: College Administration, College Choice, Comparative Analysis, Data Collection
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Marks, Joseph L. – New Directions for Institutional Research, 1996
A new model for college fact books is proposed, to create a new generation of institutional research reports that offer more comparative and unit- or topic-specific information, with illustrations, that would be useful for current decision-making needs. (MSE)
Descriptors: Change Strategies, College Administration, Comparative Analysis, Decision Making
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
McGuire, Michael D. – New Directions for Institutional Research, 1995
It is argued that research testing the reliability and validity of college and university reputational studies should be conducted, a concern not raised by consumers and publishers. Two studies of "America's Best Colleges," published by "U.S. News and World Report," raise questions about the guide's validity and suggest that…
Descriptors: College Administration, College Choice, Comparative Analysis, Evaluation Criteria
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2