NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 8 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ebong, Imeh D. – SRA Journal, 1999
Presents a framework for ranking college faculty based on their sponsored-project histories, a departure from conventional academic ranking. Distribution of faculty among these ranks within a unit produces a "funding persistence" profile capable of measuring faculty sponsored-project activity independent of the institutional-productivity model.…
Descriptors: Academic Rank (Professional), College Faculty, Comparative Analysis, Faculty Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Machung, Anne – Change, 1998
The "U.S. News and World Report" rankings of colleges do not affect institutions equally; the schools impacted most are those that have the most to lose because they benefit from, even rely on, the rankings for prestige and visibility. The magazine relies on the rankings for substantial sales revenues, and has garnered considerable power…
Descriptors: College Administration, College Choice, Comparative Analysis, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Webster, David S. – Academe, 1992
Although college rankings published in mass media may not be the best way of comparing colleges, they provide more useful information than accrediting agencies, college catalogs, and most college guides. Administrators, not magazines are to blame for their misuse. Rankings can help motivate programs, departments, and institutions to improve…
Descriptors: Accrediting Agencies, Comparative Analysis, Educational Quality, Evaluation Criteria
Hay, Tina M. – Currents, 1992
Although higher education institutions dislike rankings published in the mass media, they like the attention the rankings create and prefer to be included rather than excluded. Common criticisms of the methodology include emphasis on inappropriate criteria, unfair comparison of private and public institutions, faulty assumptions, inaccurate data,…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Evaluation Criteria, Higher Education, Mass Media
Gravely, Archer R.; Cochran, Thomas R. – 1991
This paper describes a systematic method of obtaining evaluative feedback based on the perceptions of various campus constituencies of a small private liberal arts college's administrative offices. A study was performed, involving two surveys conducted three years apart and using similar forms and procedures. The survey instrument assessed three…
Descriptors: College Administration, Comparative Analysis, Employee Attitudes, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Groth, Randall H.; And Others – SRA Journal of the Society of Research Administrators, 1992
Application of a multidimensional measure of university research activity, the Research Activity Index (RAI), is described and compared to the more common use of research and development expenditures as a criterion of activity. The RAI incorporates seven expenditure variables, three graduate-student-related variables, and a research library…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Expenditures
Simpson, Kristen – Currents, 1998
In an interview, the managing editor of a major publication in higher education explains what the media want to know about such issues as college and program rankings, affirmative action, college costs, crime on campus, and how colleges can communicate their positions better, make their messages more coherent, and influence the opinions of both…
Descriptors: Affirmative Action, College Environment, Comparative Analysis, Crime
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hall, Frances R.; And Others – Academic Medicine, 1992
A study found that the admission interview scores for 62 Dartmouth Medical School (New Hampshire) applicants correlated positively with dean's letter ratings given 4 years later and that interview scores were better predictors of ratings than were total Medical College Admission Test scores or science grade point averages. (Author/MSE)
Descriptors: Admission Criteria, College Applicants, College Entrance Examinations, Comparative Analysis