Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Source
| Journal of the Society of… | 2 |
| State Educational Technology… | 2 |
| Research Management Review | 1 |
| Wallace Foundation | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Research | 3 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Secondary Education | 3 |
Audience
| Administrators | 6 |
| Policymakers | 3 |
| Practitioners | 3 |
Location
| South Carolina | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Elementary and Secondary… | 2 |
| No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 2 |
| Every Student Succeeds Act… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkManna, Paul – Wallace Foundation, 2022
This paper summarizes research on the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) Leadership Learning Community (ELLC) and the University Principal Preparation Program (UPPI). The Wallace Foundation created these efforts and supported them financially to test ideas for improving the work of principals and enhancing the supports they receive on the job.…
Descriptors: Instructional Leadership, Principals, Leadership Training, Faculty Development
Peer reviewedKostoff, Ronald N. – Research Management Review, 1992
The practice and methods of federal research impact assessment are described. Three areas of evaluation (selection of research project, research review, and postresearch assessment) are examined, and different evaluation methods (qualitative, retrospective, and quantitative) are compared. Peer evaluation, the most common assessment method, is seen…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Federal Aid, Higher Education, Peer Evaluation
Peer reviewedWaugaman, Paul G.; Martin, Evrette L. – Journal of the Society of Research Administrators, 1985
A survey of South Carolina participants in Small Business Innovative Research programs, conducted to evaluate previous assumptions about research success factors, found that success hinged on the principal investigator's background, the presence of university connections for the project, and the project's ability to respond to the agency's stated…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Program Administration, Program Effectiveness, Research Design
Peer reviewedWalsh, Donald E. – Journal of the Society of Research Administrators, 1986
The self-imposed external evaluation of a university grants office is reported, including discussions of the office's and administrator's roles, comparison with similar-sized institutions and programs, the review process, and its results. (MSE)
Descriptors: Administrative Organization, Administrator Characteristics, Administrator Role, Comparative Analysis
Download full textState Educational Technology Directors Association, 2008
The State Educational Technology Directors Association (SETDA) is pleased to release its fifth annual National Trends Report on the use of federal funds to support educational technology. This report documents findings from Round 5 (FY 06) of the No Child Left Behind, Title II, Part D, Enhancing Education Through Technology (NCLB IID) program. The…
Descriptors: Educational Practices, Retrenchment, Electronic Learning, Web Based Instruction
State Educational Technology Directors Association, 2007
The State Educational Technology Directors Association (SETDA) is pleased to release its fourth annual National Trends Report on the use of federal funds to support educational technology. This report documents findings from Round 4 (FY 05) of the No Child Left Behind, Title II Part D, Enhancing Education Through Technology (NCLB II D) program.…
Descriptors: Educational Technology, Evidence, Grants, School Districts
