Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Author
| Hunter, Amélie | 1 |
| Jensen, Ben | 1 |
| McCullough, Laura | 1 |
| Panckhurst, Fay | 1 |
| Phillips, Vicki | 1 |
| Roberts-Hull, Katie | 1 |
| Sonnemann, Julie | 1 |
Publication Type
| Opinion Papers | 2 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 2 |
| Guides - Non-Classroom | 1 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
| Administrators | 3 |
| Policymakers | 3 |
| Practitioners | 2 |
| Teachers | 1 |
Location
| Canada | 1 |
| China (Shanghai) | 1 |
| Hong Kong | 1 |
| New Zealand | 1 |
| Singapore | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Program for International… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkJensen, Ben; Sonnemann, Julie; Roberts-Hull, Katie; Hunter, Amélie – National Center on Education and the Economy, 2016
This report illustrates how four high-performing systems--British Columbia (Canada), Hong Kong, Shanghai (China) and Singapore--developed their teacher professional learning. The report and accompanying materials are designed as a resource for teachers, school leaders and policymakers wanting to improve teacher professional learning in their…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Faculty Development, Teacher Education, Program Development
Peer reviewedPhillips, Vicki; McCullough, Laura – Exceptional Children, 1990
The article discusses conceptual principles which underpin development of consultation-based programing for students with mild disabilities, proposes informal standards for ecological evaluation of specific formats, and identifies factors (such as administrative support and participatory planning and decision making) that maximize the potential…
Descriptors: Administration, Consultation Programs, Delivery Systems, Educational Methods
Panckhurst, Fay; And Others – 1987
A questionnaire survey canvassed the views of 72 New Zealand educators, in order to identify gaps or deficiencies in services and to establish priorities for development. Respondents were asked to comment on special education system strengths, growing points, desirable policy directions, and special interests. Four issues emerged as central to…
Descriptors: Delivery Systems, Disabilities, Early Intervention, Educational Methods
