Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Author
| Haisley, F. B. | 1 |
| Intriligator, Barbara A. | 1 |
| Jerald, Craig D. | 1 |
| Noggle, Nelson L. | 1 |
| Packard, Richard D. | 1 |
| Robinson, Glen E. | 1 |
| Van Hook, Kristan | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Evaluative | 3 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 3 |
| Opinion Papers | 2 |
| Guides - Non-Classroom | 1 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
| Policymakers | 7 |
| Practitioners | 5 |
| Administrators | 2 |
Location
| California | 1 |
| Oregon | 1 |
| United States | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Education Consolidation… | 1 |
| Education for All Handicapped… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Download full textJerald, Craig D.; Van Hook, Kristan – National Institute for Excellence in Teaching, 2011
Teacher evaluation has emerged as a major focus for reform at the highest levels of education policymaking, and for good reason. Most evaluations are based on scant evidence of actual effectiveness, produce inflated ratings, and provide teachers with little useful feedback. This paper offers policymakers and practitioners important "lessons…
Descriptors: Evidence, Feedback (Response), Teacher Effectiveness, Teacher Evaluation
Intriligator, Barbara A. – 1982
Although Public Law 94-142 (Education for All Handicapped Children Act) raised public awareness of the civil rights of the handicapped, the policy problems that it was intended to solve included more than civil rights issues. In particular, the law did not provide for modifications of its policies in improving public education opportunities for…
Descriptors: Educational Policy, Elementary Secondary Education, Formative Evaluation, Policy Formation
Packard, Richard D. – 1990
To assure accountability to educational policy developed by elected and appointed leaders, agencies and organizations must adopt high quality evaluation designs tailored to meet three basic tenets: (1) different processes for policy formation and demonstration of accountability; (2) clear accountability expectations built into policies; (3)…
Descriptors: Accountability, Elementary Secondary Education, Formative Evaluation, Organizational Development
Robinson, Glen E. – ERS Concerns in Education, 1983
This presentation examines the history of merit pay and analyzes studies and research on merit pay to discover directions for developing effective procedures. Reasons for failure of merit pay plans include administrative problems, personnel problems, collective bargaining, financial problems, unsatisfactory evaluation, staff dissension,…
Descriptors: Administrative Problems, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Formative Evaluation
RMC Research Corp., Denver, CO. – 1990
This guide presents the components and implementation phases of the Technical Assistance Center's Chapter 1 Program Improvement Process. The goal of this process is to improve the achievement of educationally disadvantaged students. The following components are discussed: (1) teamwork; (2) informed decision-making; (3) vision setting; (4) research…
Descriptors: Compensatory Education, Educational Improvement, Educational Objectives, Educationally Disadvantaged
Haisley, F. B.; And Others – 1983
Intended to provide background information for task force use, this set of working papers concludes with recommendations for revising the University of Oregon College of Education teacher preparation programs. Section I summarizes the concerns of Oregon educators, reports recommendations made by an ad hoc state committee and the chancellor, and…
Descriptors: Beginning Teachers, Cooperative Programs, Educational Administration, Elementary Secondary Education
Noggle, Nelson L.; And Others – 1981
A 2-phase study provided summative information on the status of the statewide implementation of California's federally funded migrant program and also provided confidential formative information to program participants at district, regional, and state levels. Guided by an advisory panel, phase I was conducted in 1980-1981 and covered all grade…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Advocacy, Basic Skills, Community Involvement
