Descriptor
| Biology | 1 |
| Chemistry | 1 |
| College Science | 1 |
| Demonstrations (Educational) | 1 |
| Discussion (Teaching… | 1 |
| Educational Research | 1 |
| Instruction | 1 |
| Instructional Effectiveness | 1 |
| Lecture Method | 1 |
| Physics | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Journal of College Science… | 1 |
Author
| Abraham, Michael R. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 1 |
| Researchers | 1 |
| Teachers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedAbraham, Michael R. – Journal of College Science Teaching, 1989
Examines two instructional strategies, the traditional and learning cycle approaches, and compares them with regard to the variables of sequence, format, and necessity. Concludes that students exposed to the laboratory and discussion type had higher test scores than those in the lecture or reading groups. (Author/RT)
Descriptors: Biology, Chemistry, College Science, Demonstrations (Educational)
