Descriptor
Court Litigation | 11 |
Drug Use Testing | 11 |
Elementary Secondary Education | 8 |
School Law | 8 |
Student Rights | 7 |
Public Schools | 6 |
Search and Seizure | 6 |
Federal Courts | 5 |
Civil Rights | 4 |
Athletes | 3 |
Constitutional Law | 3 |
More ▼ |
Source
American School Board Journal | 2 |
Journal of Law and Education | 2 |
CUPA Journal | 1 |
Journal of College and… | 1 |
Author
Gibbs, Annette | 2 |
Dowling-Sendor, Benjamin | 1 |
Hininger, Janice A. | 1 |
Jones, Rebecca | 1 |
Orr, Ginger | 1 |
Rossow, Lawrence F. | 1 |
Schaller, William Lynch | 1 |
Schreck, Myron | 1 |
Sultanik, Jeffrey T. | 1 |
Weeks, J. Devereux | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 6 |
Legal/Legislative/Regulatory… | 5 |
Opinion Papers | 5 |
Guides - Non-Classroom | 2 |
Information Analyses | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Books | 1 |
ERIC Publications | 1 |
Historical Materials | 1 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Practitioners | 11 |
Administrators | 9 |
Policymakers | 4 |
Teachers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Fourth Amendment | 3 |
New Jersey v TLO | 1 |
United States Constitution | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Gibbs, Annette – CUPA Journal, 1991
A discussion of mandatory drug testing for college athletes reviews the National Collegiate Athletic Association's policy, arguments for and against such testing, the results of relevant court litigation, and the legal ramifications for college administration. The testing of employees in both public and private sectors is also briefly addressed.…
Descriptors: Athletes, College Administration, College Athletics, Court Litigation

Orr, Ginger – Journal of Law and Education, 2000
Discusses the importance of drug-testing policies for educators by analyzing the recent Sixth Circuit Court of Appeal's decision in "Knox v. Knox." Concludes that mandatory drug testing for educators in safety-sensitive positions will not infringe on the constitutional rights of school employees. (Contains 30 footnotes.) (MLF)
Descriptors: Boards of Education, Court Litigation, Drug Use Testing, Elementary Secondary Education
Schreck, Myron – 1991
In 1985, the United States Supreme Court, in "New Jersey v. T.L.O.," held that the Fourth Amendment applies to searches and seizures conducted by public school administrators. This paper discusses the current state of Fourth Amendment law with regard to public school searches and seizures. Among the subtopics discussed are the following:…
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Drug Use Testing, Elementary Secondary Education, Federal Courts

Sultanik, Jeffrey T. – Journal of Law and Education, 1990
In response to an earlier article by Eugene Lincoln, presents two hypothetical cases that respectively deal with the possible effects of drug use on school premises and with a policy governing mandatory urine testing for student athletes. Cites factors that should be incorporated in any mandatory drug testing policy. (MLF)
Descriptors: Administrator Role, Athletics, Court Litigation, Drug Use Testing
Minnesota House of Representatives, St. Paul. Research Dept. – 1989
This document examines the Fourth Amendment as the source of search and seizure law; drug testing of school employees; and drug testing searches of students. The United States Supreme Court case that established the two-part test to determine the legality of a student search is discussed, three separate student drug testing programs that have been…
Descriptors: Constitutional Law, Court Litigation, Drug Use Testing, Educational Legislation
Jones, Rebecca – American School Board Journal, 1996
Filing a lawsuit against a school district often means challenging the core values of a community. Cases discussed include a suit to prevent the broadcasting of morning prayers in school ("Herdahl"), a suit over the singing of a religious song ("Bauchman"), and drug-use testing for student athletes ("Acton"). (MLF)
Descriptors: Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Court Litigation, Drug Use Testing
Dowling-Sendor, Benjamin – American School Board Journal, 1999
The recent decision of the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in "Miller," based on the school district's interest in preventing possible abuse, gave legal support for random, suspiciousless drug testing of students. Contends this is a "slippery slope" argument, that the key factor in deciding whether to adopt a policy of random drug testing should…
Descriptors: Board of Education Policy, Court Litigation, Drug Use Testing, Elementary Secondary Education
Rossow, Lawrence F.; Hininger, Janice A. – 1991
Many of the court decisions in the 1960s and 1970s regarding student civil rights were decided in favor of students. By the 1980s the courts began to give administrators more authority. This change of judicial thinking means that school authorities must be reschooled concerning the rights of students. This booklet should help administrators…
Descriptors: Civil Law, Civil Rights, Court Litigation, Discipline

Schaller, William Lynch – Journal of College and University Law, 1991
Discussion of drug testing in intercollegiate athletics programs looks at federal and state regulation of drug-testing programs as it affects student-athletes and, in comparison, the employer-employee relationship. Judicial approaches in student-athlete drug-testing cases are also examined. Increased federal regulation is seen as imminent. Steps…
Descriptors: Athletes, College Athletics, Comparative Analysis, Compliance (Legal)
Weeks, J. Devereux – 1992
Public school principals and teachers have a compelling need to understand student rights when teaching constitutional principles that apply to students. This book seeks to help both students and educators understand those rights. The work concerns itself with the fundamental federal constitutional rights of public school students. A study of the…
Descriptors: Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Corporal Punishment, Court Litigation
Gibbs, Annette – 1992
This monograph suggests solutions for the conflicts, especially prominent in recent years, between students and higher education institutions concerning their respective rights and responsibilities. The discussion focuses particularly on regulating offensive speech, rights of association and assembly, drug testing for athletes, and student safety…
Descriptors: Athletes, Civil Rights, College Students, Colleges