Descriptor
| Comparative Analysis | 2 |
| Data Interpretation | 2 |
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Institutional Characteristics | 2 |
| Institutional Research | 2 |
| Peer Institutions | 2 |
| College Planning | 1 |
| Data Analysis | 1 |
| Research Methodology | 1 |
Source
| New Directions for… | 2 |
Publication Type
| Guides - Non-Classroom | 2 |
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Administrators | 2 |
| Practitioners | 2 |
| Researchers | 2 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedWhiteley, Meredith A.; Stage, Frances K. – New Directions for Institutional Research, 1987
The widespread use of comparative data can lead to problems on a campus unless the data are systematically incorporated in the institutional planning cycle. A model has been developed to alleviate a number of problems and increase the power of comparison as a management tool. (MSE)
Descriptors: College Planning, Comparative Analysis, Data Interpretation, Higher Education
Peer reviewedBrinkman, Paul T.; Teeter, Deborah J. – New Directions for Institutional Research, 1987
Institutional comparison groups can be selected in several ways, depending on the comparison issue. The method chosen involves both technical and political considerations. (Author/MSE)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Data Analysis, Data Interpretation, Higher Education
