Descriptor
Author
| Duke, Daniel L. | 1 |
| Gillet, Pamela | 1 |
| Lovell, Ned B. | 1 |
| Riegle, Rodney P. | 1 |
| Splitt, David A. | 1 |
| Thomas, Stephen B. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Guides - Non-Classroom | 3 |
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Legal/Legislative/Regulatory… | 2 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 5 |
| Policymakers | 1 |
| Researchers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Education for All Handicapped… | 2 |
| Fourteenth Amendment | 1 |
| Rehabilitation Act 1973… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Gillet, Pamela – Education Unlimited, 1980
The current status of minimal competency tests for special education students is discussed with particular emphasis on the legal implications. (SBH)
Descriptors: Compliance (Legal), Disabilities, Elementary Secondary Education, Federal Legislation
Peer reviewedLovell, Ned B.; Riegle, Rodney P. – Illinois School Research and Development, 1980
This article presents 11 concrete policy guidelines to help school districts avoid some of the most common problems associated with the implementation of minimal competency testing. (Author/SJL)
Descriptors: Administrative Problems, Administrator Guides, Elementary Secondary Education, Guidelines
Duke, Daniel L.; And Others – Phi Delta Kappan, 1978
Six sets of emerging issues that could involve specific students and classroom situations are discussed here: class suspensions and due process, class rules and teacher inconsistency, classroom equality of opportunity, competency testing, classification of students, and classroom management in alternative schools. (Author)
Descriptors: Classroom Techniques, Court Litigation, Due Process, Equal Education
Splitt, David A. – Executive Educator, 1984
Discusses cases involving a nontenured high school coach's firing, state-mandated competency testing, and civil rights of public employees. (KS)
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Due Process, Elementary Secondary Education, Federal Courts
Thomas, Stephen B. – 1985
Handicapped students are now protected by specific statutes in addition to the broad constitutional protection offered all students. As the number of related statutes, regulations, and case law decisions grew, assimilation became increasingly difficult. This publication attempts to meet educators' need for a succinct guide in special education…
Descriptors: Athletics, Board of Education Policy, Court Litigation, Disabilities
