Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Access to Education | 1 |
| Aesthetic Values | 1 |
| Art Appreciation | 1 |
| Art Education | 1 |
| Art Materials | 1 |
| Career Development | 1 |
| College Choice | 1 |
| Colleges | 1 |
| Competition | 1 |
| Costs | 1 |
| Cross Cultural Studies | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Reports - Descriptive | 2 |
| Books | 1 |
| Collected Works - General | 1 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
| Researchers | 2 |
| Policymakers | 1 |
| Practitioners | 1 |
| Teachers | 1 |
Location
| Nigeria | 1 |
| Pennsylvania (Pittsburgh) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkKelly, Andrew P., Ed.; Howell, Jessica S., Ed.; Sattin-Bajaj, Carolyn, Ed. – Harvard Education Press, 2016
"Matching Students to Opportunity" expands on the discussion of a critical issue in college access and success: the match between prospective students and the colleges in which they enroll. Research indicates that ensuring a good match significantly increases a student's chance of graduating. The contributors to this volume argue that…
Descriptors: Access to Education, Student Characteristics, Institutional Characteristics, College Choice
Peer reviewedUduehi, Joseph – Visual Arts Research, 1995
Reiterates the criticism that the Maitland Graves Design Judgment Test is inadequate in measuring aesthetic judgment as defined by Graves, especially in a cross-cultural setting. United States students consistently scored highest. Nonetheless, all students responded favorably to three factors: symmetry, three-dimensionality, and complex design.…
Descriptors: Aesthetic Values, Art Appreciation, Art Education, Art Materials
