NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 5 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lovtrup, Soren – Human Development, 1984
The correlation between ontogeny and phylogeny is analyzed through the discussion of four theories on the reality, history, epigenetic, and ecological aspects of the mechanism of evolution. Also discussed are historical and creative aspects of evolution and three epigenetic mechanisms instantiated in the case of the amphibian embryo. (Author/RH)
Descriptors: Ecology, Evolution, History, Realism
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Buscaglia, Marino – Human Development, 1984
Argues that ontogenetic and phylogenetic theories are related and that such a coupling can be established only in reference to a metatheory. The metatheory is construed in terms of a combination of logical coherence and requirements necessary for generalization as well as comprehensive, philosophical representations of living beings (e.g.,…
Descriptors: Biology, Evolution, Genetics, Scientific Concepts
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Voneche, Jacques – Human Development, 1984
Discusses ontogeny and phylogeny in Piaget's work, differences between Piagetian (constructivist) and Darwinian (selectionist) approaches, and problems associated with transposing conceptual systems from one field to another. (RH)
Descriptors: Biology, Evolution, Individual Development, Scientific Concepts
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Cellerier, Guy – Human Development, 1984
Argues for unifying the conceptual frameworks of theories of evolution so that problems and their solutions in one theory may be transposed and explored in the others. The argument is used to reconsider the mutationist and Darwinian theories of evolution in the light of Piaget's nonstandard theory of evolution. (Author/RH)
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Evolution, Genetics, Schemata (Cognition)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Dupuis, Claude – Human Development, 1984
Discusses the conditions for validating customary phylogenetic procedures. Concludes that the requisites of homogeneity and completeness for proved short lineages seem satisfied by the Hennigian but not the Haeckelian procedure. The epistemological antinomy of the two procedures is emphasized for the first time. (Author/RH)
Descriptors: Biology, Comparative Analysis, Epistemology, Evolution