NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 8 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Roberts, Patricia M.; Meltzer, Ann; Wilding, Joanne – Journal of Communication Disorders, 2009
Data on disfluencies in the speech of non-stuttering adults are relevant to several aspects of the assessment and treatment of adults who stutter. Currently, very few sources provide relevant data. In the existing literature on normally fluent speakers, there is no consistency in sample length or topic or in which types of disfluency are counted.…
Descriptors: Speech, Stuttering, Communication Disorders, Males
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Tatchell, J. A.; And Others – Journal of Communication Disorders, 1991
Results of nasalance measurements of 18 hearing-impaired children (ages 3-11) under the conditions of aided speech, unaided speech, and speech with amplification found no significant differences when comparisons were made between younger and older groups and when made according to the severity of hearing loss. (Author/DB)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Children, Comparative Analysis, Hearing Impairments
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Walker, Christopher Niles; Morris, Hughlett L. – Journal of Communication Disorders, 1988
Ten esophageal speakers and ten normal speakers produced repetitions of the disyllable /mama/ using five different conditions of syllable stress. Nine normal listeners judged both relative and absolute syllable stress. Reliable judgments were made of the syllable stress, and speakers were able to effect systematic changes in listener perceptions…
Descriptors: Articulation Impairments, Comparative Analysis, Speech Communication, Speech Skills
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Rollins, Pamela R.; And Others – Journal of Communication Disorders, 1994
This study compared pragmatic skills of 5 children (ages 4-6) with specific language impairments (SLI) and their younger siblings matched for mean length of utterance. Analysis of communicative acts on three levels (social interchange, speech act, and conversational) indicated comparable performance within sibling pairs, but SLI children…
Descriptors: Communication Skills, Comparative Analysis, Expressive Language, Language Acquisition
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Oxman, Thomas E.; And Others – Journal of Communication Disorders, 1988
Free speech of subjects with somatization and paranoia was analyzed to identify and compare self-concept dimensions reflected in their lexical choices. The somatization disorder group conveyed a sense of negativism, distress, and preoccupation with an uncertain self-identity. The paranoid patients portrayed an artificially positive, grandiose…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Content Analysis, Discourse Analysis, Emotional Disturbances
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Madison, Charles L.; Wong, Elizabeth Y. F. – Journal of Communication Disorders, 1992
This study, involving 20 children (ages 4-11) with severe hearing impairments, affirmed the content validity of the Clark-Madison Test of Oral Language as a measure of nonwritten expressive language with hearing-impaired children. Performance comparison with hearing individuals revealed a different profile of strengths and weaknesses than did…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Content Validity, Deafness, Elementary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ehrlich, Jonathan S. – Journal of Communication Disorders, 1988
Ten head-injured adults were compared to normal adults on a narrative picture description task. Subjects were similar in amount of pertinent content expressed, narrative length, and rate of speech, but were significantly slower in rate of information imparted as they required lengthier and slower verbal outputs to convey essential information.…
Descriptors: Communication Disorders, Comparative Analysis, Discourse Analysis, Expressive Language
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Luftig, Richard L.; Bersani, Henry A., Jr. – Journal of Communication Disorders, 1988
The learning of a list of 20 Blissymbols and comparable American Sign Language signs by 121 nonhandicapped undergraduate psychology students was compared. Blissymbols were learned significantly faster than manual signs, particularly in early learning trials. Results are discussed in terms of the memory requirements of the two systems. (Author/JDD)
Descriptors: American Sign Language, Communication Aids (for Disabled), Comparative Analysis, Difficulty Level